Author Archives: myip2z2

Panama 2012, GM Hansen,E(CAN) in CB Report

Hansen,E is in the news again. See nice CB report.

2012 Panama Open: IM Eric Hansen scores 2900 performance!

11.12.2012 – Set in the lovely tropics, the Panama Open just took place, attracting many players from abroad, seeking relief from the cold and at times freezing winter temperatures in their home countries. The 2012 edition also witnessed a record performance for an IM, as Canadian IM Eric Hansen scored an imperial 8.5/9 and a 2900 performance.’

The first illustrated report by Alina L’Ami.

‘They say the best philosophy is to live in the now, to live the moment, carpe diem…but I know one particular case when I would personally recommend living either in the past or in the future: long haul flights. If you seize the moment in a 40 cm width chair you might soon start being over conscious of every single square centimeter of your body. And that’s not really pleasant.(more)…’

GM Hansen,E(CAN)
A very nice followup report on the Panama Open.
Author/photographer Alina L’Ami with colorful locals

‘…Several parks and avenues throughout Panama bear the name “Vasco Núñez de Balboa,”; his name is also attached to Panama City’s main port, Balboa (the Pacific entrance to the Panama Canal) and a number of monuments honour his “discovery” of the South Sea. The Panamanian currency is called the Balboa, although the US dollar is used interchangeably. What I found interesting is that although one US dollar is exactly one Balboa in Panama, outside the country it is a completely different story. Besides, one cannot find any Balboa notes at all except coins….(more)

Attack Tools(Non-Chess)

When you attack, the right tools are essential.

Hungarian Womens Ch 2012 Rd5

Here is an important game from rd5

WGM Gara,T-Wikipedia

Gara,T (2377) – Schneider,Ve (2306)
Sicilian Kan[B42]
60th ch-HUN w 2012 Kisvarda HUN (5), 08.12.2012
In a tense but balanced game black achieved a nice position. Later, black tried too hard to force the issue and opened up the kingside. Now white is in control.

Critical Position
Black’s kingside is loose. How should white proceed?

White to Play

Critical Position
Black’s king is shelterig behind the kingside pawns. How does white make progress?

White to Play

London Open 2012

Here us an instructive game from the London Classic Open between GM Hebden and Hungarian junior Szabo,Bence.

Themes examined include

  • Good knight vs. bad bishop
  • Forcing sequences
  • Better pawn structure
  • Experienced verteran vs promising junior

Szabo,Bence
Photo-Chessbase

GM Hebden,M (ENG 2547) – Szabo,B (HUN 2365)
Zukertort System [A46]
4th London Classic Open London ENG (7.6), 07.12.2012

Position 1
The middlegame is underway and jockeying for position has begun. Black has just played 15..Be4 and aims for piece control of the central squares.
Q1 How do you assess the position?
Q2 How should white react?

White to Play

15…Be4

Critical Position 2
The technical N-B P+ conversion phase has arrived. How should white continue? This is a matter of understanding vs calculation.

White to Play

42..e5

TWIC 944(HUN-CAN) Summary 2012-12

Introduction
TWIC is the work of Mark Crowther theweekinchess

Portuguese Supercup 2012
GM Spraggett,K(CAN) 1.0/1

Washington International 2012
Kamsky took clear first with 7pts.

table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Rank Name Rating Pts
1 Kamsky,G 2744 7
2 Gareev,T 2658 6.5
3 Shabalov,A 2534 6.5
42 Hess,Peter(CAN) 1921 1.5

TCh-SLO
Ribli,Horvath,T, Horvath A and Ruck R

TCh-HUN
Bundesliga Week 5

The following events were already reported on else where in the blog so results were not repeated.

London Classic Open
First Saturday 2012-12

Here is game from Peter Hess from the Washington International, where he draws a master

Verifying Schandorff:Grunfeld Russian System 7..Na6

Playing 1.d4 The Indian Defences(Quality Chess 2012) presents a wealth of repertoire ideas. Here let’s take a closer look at the Russian System against 7…Na6 in the Grunfeld.

Schandorff  recommends 15.a3!? against the Prins(7..Na6) and analyzes an old correspondance game to support this idea.

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Qb3 dxc4 6.Qxc4 0–0 7.e4 Na6 8.Be2 c5 9.d5 e6 10.0–0 exd5 11.exd5 Re8 12.Rd1 Bf5 13.d6 h6 14.Bf4 Nd7 15.a3

Let us see the key game (#39 in Playing 1.d4 The Indian Defences).

Ihlenfeld,Eckart (GER) – Bekemann,Uwe (GER)
Grunfeld Russian System 7…Na6 [D97]
Germany BFM corr BdF, 1998
The fast advance of the d-pawn is a double-edged sword. The pawn has a disruptive cramping effect but can itself become a target.

Position 1
Here I am proposing an novelty for black as an improvement. In the game black played 16…Nb8 but I think black can do better. What do you propose?
-Stay with 16…Nb8
-Play a different(better) move

Black to Play

First Saturday 2012 Standings Rd9

FMB
Nemeth, Otto takes the lead with 6.5/9. Mihajlova, Diana is at second with 6/9. Mihajlova wrote a nice report for Chessbase that is worth a look.

A panorama of Budapest with a view over the Danube and the Houses of Parliament

Photo and Report by Mihajlova Diana [See Chessbase]

table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Rk. Name Rtg FED 1 2 3 4 5 Pts.
1 Nemeth Otto 1781 HUN *** 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 6.5
2 Mihajlova Diana 1479 ENG 1 *** 1 0 1 1 ½ 1 6
3 Engelbrecht Imre Dr. 1640 HUN 1 0 0 1 *** 1 ½ 1 5
4 Czipp Janos 1445 HUN 0 0 0 0 0 *** 1 ½ 2.5
5 Bella Zsolt 1401 HUN 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 0 ½ *** 2.5
6 Dickel Hans 0 GER 0 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 1.5

FMA
Bohus Adam and Farkas Richard shared first with 6.5/9.

table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Rk. Name Rtg FED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pts.
1 Bohus Adam 1819 HUN * ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 + ½ 1 6.5
2 Farkas Richard 2115 HUN ½ * ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 6.5
3 Juracsik Jozsef 2145 HUN 0 ½ * ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 ½ 6
4 Grimm Gyorgy 2043 HUN ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 6
5 Montolio Benedicto Cesar 1962 ESP ½ 0 0 ½ * 1 0 ½ 1 1 4.5
6 Lukacs Albert 1858 HUN ½ 0 0 ½ 0 * 1 1 ½ 1 4.5
7 FM Mayer Istvan 2058 HUN 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 0 * 1 ½ ½ 4
8 Kuehn Matthias 1958 GER ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 * 1 1 3.5
9 Marcu Simon 1909 SVK ½ 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * 1 2.5
10 Brassoi Tarnovszki A 0 HUN 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 * 1

GM
IM Antipov Mikhail took clear first with 6.5/9
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Rk. Name Rtg FED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pts.
1 IM Antipov Mikhail Al. 2456 RUS * 1 0 0 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 6.5
2 IM Franco Alonso Alejandro 2480 ESP 0 * 1 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 6
3 GM Czebe Attila 2481 HUN 1 0 * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 5.5
4 IM Radlovacki Jovan 2419 SRB 1 0 ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 5
5 GM Lalic Bogdan 2484 CRO ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ 1 0 ½ ½ 4.5
6 GM Varga Zoltan 2455 HUN 0 0 ½ ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ 4
7 FM Dastan Muhammed Batuhan 2370 TUR 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ * 1 1 ½ 4
8 FM Tesik Csaba 2369 HUN 0 ½ ½ 0 1 0 0 * ½ 1 3.5
9 FM Bagi Mate 2364 HUN 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ * 0 3
10 IM Arngrimsson Dagur 2384 ISL 0 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 1 * 3

IM
Hou Qiang(CHN) won with 7.5/9.

table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Rk. Name FED Rtg Pts.
1 FM Hou Qiang CHN 2345 7.5
2 IM Kislik Erik Andrew USA 2361 6.5
3 FM Kantor Gergely HUN 2306 5.5
4 IM Szeberenyi Adam HUN 2331 5
5 Grimm Daniel HUN 2198 4.5
6 FM Lyell Mark ENG 2226 4.5
7 IM Kahn Evarth Dr. HUN 2255 3.5
8 IM Boguszlavszkij Jevgenyij HUN 2208 3
9 Morin Yves CAN 2201 2.5
10 IM Szalanczy Emil HUN 2259 2.5

Hungarian Womens Ch 2012 Rd7 Standings

Gara Ticia and Papp Petra continue to lead with 5.5/7.

Juhasz Barbara
 

table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }

Rk. Name Rtg FED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pts.
1 WGM Gara Ticia 2377 HUN * ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 5.5
2 WGM Papp Petra 2254 HUN ½ * ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 5.5
3 WGM Schneider Veronika 2306 HUN 0 * 0 1 1 1 ½ 1 4.5
4 WIM Dudas Eszter 2243 HUN ½ ½ 1 * 0 1 ½ 1 4.5
5 Erdos Boglarka 2185 HUN 0 0 * 0 1 ½ 1 1 3.5
6 WGM Rudolf Anna 2322 HUN ½ 0 1 1 * 0 ½ ½ 3.5
7 WIM Varga Klara 2210 HUN ½ 0 0 0 1 * ½ ½ 2.5
8 WIM Goczo Melinda 2234 HUN 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ 2.5
9 Juhasz Barbara 2085 HUN 0 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ * ½ 2
10 Ruszin Anna 2133 HUN 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ * 1

Veriying Schandorff: The Benko Gambit 5.f3

GM Schandorff proposes the line 5.f3 for the task of beating up the Benko Gambit in Playing 1.d4 The Indian Defences(Quality Chess 2012). There is a key sacrificial (12.Nfd5!?) idea at the heart of the active 5…e6 response that needs close checking.

He devotes three games to this idea and has some far reaching analysis that I checked as part of the analysis of the following recent game.

Croad,N (2255) – Samhouri,B (2244)
5.f3 e6[A57]
40th Olympiad Open Istanbul TUR (7.43), 04.09.2012[Yip]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.f3 Key point. This line is not so popular but Schandorff believes it is due for a comeback.[Yip] 5…e6 The most challenging defence.[Yip] 6.e4 exd5 7.e5 Qe7 8.Qe2 Ng8 9.Nc3 Bb7 10.Nh3 c4 11.Nf4 Qc5 Diagram

12.Nfxd5!?
Key point. This is a fantastic idea that is analyzed in games 59-61 in Playing 1.d4: Indian Defences by Schandorff(Quality Chess 2012). This sacrificial idea is one of the backbone ideas behind the f3 repertoire.

Key Position 1
White is indicating an attack with his last move. White has the strong bishops and mobile pawns for the piece while black has trouble getting the queenside pieces to coordinate. What do you think black should do? Here I am proposing  a small improvement for black. Maybe you will find it too.

Black to Play

24.f4

Grunfeld Trends 2012

The following position is now very popular in the g3 Grunfeld.

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 d5 5.cxd5 Nxd5 6.Nf3 Nb6 7.Nc3 Nc6 8.e3 0–0 9.0–0 Re8 10.Re1 a5

Here is an important recent game showing the latest developments.

Sargissian,G (2679) – Vachier Lagrave,M (2711)
Grunfeld g3 10.Re1 a5[D76]
TCh-ESP CECLUB Div Honor 2012 Leon ESP (1.4), 05.11.2012

Position 1
White is preparing to attack on the dark squares. Assess the alternatives and recommend one for black
(a)24…Nc4
(b)24…Rd7

Black to Play

24.Qf4
Position 2
What should black do now?
32…Rdxd5(chops off the active Rd5 and leaves Re5 in the center)
32…Red5(chops off the active Rd5 and leaves Rd7 to guard the 7th rank)
32…f6(holds the important e5 point and keeps up the pressure on Rd5)
32…Rde7(seems passive and gives up the d-file)
Black to Play
32.Rd5