Category Archives: Kislik E
Czech Open A 2013 Rd7-IM Kislik E(USA)
TWIC 977 Pardubice Gallery
IM Kislik(USA) has been based in Hungary for several years now. This is his instructive round 7 victory. IMs Kislik and Battey(USA) are two of a handful of foreign players based in Hungary.
US results
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: ; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }
SNo | Name | FIDE | FED | Pts. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
57 | IM | Smith Bryan | 2456 | USA | 5 |
91 | WGM | Nemcova Katerina | 2382 | USA | 4 |
109 | IM | Kislik Erik Andrew | 2345 | USA | 5 |
125 | IM | Battey Alexander | 2304 | USA | 4.5 |
Kislik,E (2345) – Sochacki,C (2459)
English Defence 4…f5[A40]
Czech Open A 2013
Pardubice CZE (7.40), 25.07.2013
Position 1
The technical phase has began as white has a clear extra pawn. What do you recommend for white?
White to Play
Reykjavik Open 2013 Rd7 Standings
Rd7 Chess-results
IM Kislik lost to IM Schreiner, Peter(AUT 2439)
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }
Title | Name | FIDE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Pts. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GM | Shulman Yury | 2563 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 4.5 |
IM | Krush Irina | 2460 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 3.5 |
IM | Bartholomew John | 2435 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
NM | Norowitz Yaacov | 2432 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 5 |
IM | Kislik Erik Andrew | 2359 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 4 |
IM | Prosviriakov Vladimir | 2297 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 4 |
FM | Jayakumar Adarsh | 2271 | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 0 | ½ | 4.5 |
Jablon Stephen | 1896 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
Hisnay Gregory | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
Evenson Kent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 2.5 | |
Kruglyak Mikhail | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Reykjavik Open 2013 Rd5-Kislik(USA)
IM Kislik,E drew a tricky ending against Huang(2478) but it’s not clear that white maximized his chances in the K+P ending.
Huang,Qian (2478) – Kislik,Erik Andrew (2359)
QGD Anti-Tartakower[D55]
Reykjavik Open 2013 (5.15), 22.02.2013
Position 1
Only white is playing for more than the draw after 45.Kd2. How should black defend?
Black to Play
Reykjavik Open 2013 Rd5 Standings(USA)
Rd5 chess-results
Budapest resident IM Kislik,E drew WGM Huang Qian(2478) and has 3.5/5.
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }
Name | RtgI | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Pts. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GM | Shulman Yury | 2563 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
IM | Krush Irina | 2460 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 3.5 |
IM | Bartholomew John | 2435 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
NM | Norowitz Yaacov | 2432 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
IM | Kislik Erik Andrew | 2359 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 3.5 |
IM | Prosviriakov Vladimir | 2297 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
FM | Jayakumar Adarsh | 2271 | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 4 |
Jablon Stephen | 1896 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Hisnay Gregory | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 2 | |
Evenson Kent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Kruglyak Mikhail | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 2 |
Reykjavik Open 2013 Rd3-Kislik(USA)
The bishop pair and weak pawn structure worked in black’s favor as IM Kislik won in rd3. White gave an exchange in a desperate bid for counterplay black defended accurately and the RR-RN conversion was no problem.
Johannesson,Oliver (1988) – Kislik,Erik Andrew (2359)
Benoni via King’s Indian[A65]
Reykjavik Open 2013 Reykjavik, Iceland (3.46), 20.02.2013
Position 1
Reykjavik Open 2013 Rd4-Kislik(USA)
Black’s kingside defenders were stripped away as white mounted a kingside attack to decide quickly as Kislik won in rd4.
Kislik,Erik Andrew (2359) – Frick,Renato (2075)
Grunfeld Exchange[D85]
Reykjavik Open 2013 Reykjavik, Iceland (4.44), 21.02.2013
The offside Na5 and bare kingside are the strategic hints for white to begin the attack. What do you suggest for white?
Reykjavik Open 2013 Rd2(USA) Results and Standings
Rd2 Chess-results
IM Kislik lost to GM Wesley So today. Kislik has been living in Budapest for several years now.
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }
SNo | Name | RtgI | RtgN | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | Pts. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 | GM | Shulman Yury | 2563 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
43 | IM | Krush Irina | 2460 | 0 | USA | 1 | ½ | 1.5 | |
46 | IM | Bartholomew John | 2435 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
47 | NM | Norowitz Yaacov | 2432 | 0 | USA | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
66 | IM | Kislik Erik Andrew | 2359 | 0 | USA | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
75 | IM | Prosviriakov Vladimir | 2297 | 0 | USA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
81 | FM | Jayakumar Adarsh | 2271 | 2349 | USA | ½ | 1 | 1.5 | |
158 | Jablon Stephen | 1896 | 1880 | USA | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
178 | Hisnay Gregory | 0 | 1778 | USA | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0.5 | |
190 | Evenson Kent | 0 | 1709 | USA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
199 | Kruglyak Mikhail | 0 | 1638 | USA | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Here is Kislik’s rd 2 game.
Reykjavik Open 2013 Rd1(USA) Standings
Rd1 chess-results
IM Kislik, currently living in Budapest, won his first game and will play Wesley So in rd2.
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; }
SNo | Name | RtgI | RtgN | FED | 1 | Pts. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25 | GM | Shulman Yury | 2563 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 |
43 | IM | Krush Irina | 2460 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 |
46 | IM | Bartholomew John | 2435 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 |
47 | NM | Norowitz Yaacov | 2432 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 |
66 | IM | Kislik Erik Andrew | 2359 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 |
75 | IM | Prosviriakov Vladimir | 2297 | 0 | USA | 1 | 1 |
81 | FM | Jayakumar Adarsh | 2271 | 2349 | USA | ½ | 0.5 |
158 | Jablon Stephen | 1896 | 1880 | USA | 0 | 0 | |
178 | Hisnay Gregory | 0 | 1778 | USA | 0 | 0 | |
190 | Evenson Kent | 0 | 1709 | USA | 0 | 0 | |
199 | Kruglyak Mikhail | 0 | 1638 | USA | 0 | 0 |
First Saturday 2012-12 IM
Here is a game by Erik Kislik from the recent First Saturday IM RR. Kislik has been living in Budapest for a few years now and plans to return to the U.S. soon.
The monthly IM norm tournaments usually have about 30% of the participants above 2300 with the occaisional 2400 and are popular in the summer peak months.
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; } Breakdown by Rating Class
UNR | U2200 | 2201-2300 | 2301-2400 | 2400+ | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 11 |
Mar | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
Apr | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
May | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 11 |
Jun | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Jun | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
Jul | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
Aug | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
Aug | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
Sept | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
Oct | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
Nov | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 12 |
Dec | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
Total | 1 | 25 | 64 | 30 | 12 | 132 |
% | 0.8% | 18.9% | 48.5% | 22.7% | 9.1% | 100% |
The net-of-IM participation breakdown shows more clearly that peak participation is in the June-July-August period and that overall about slighlty over half the participants are candidate IMs.
table.tableizer-table { border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; } .tableizer-table td { padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc; } .tableizer-table th { background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold; } Breakdown by Title Class
IM | Non-IM | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Feb | 6 | 5 | 11 |
Mar | 5 | 6 | 11 |
Apr | 7 | 3 | 10 |
May | 4 | 7 | 11 |
Jun | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Jun | 5 | 5 | 10 |
Jul | 4 | 7 | 11 |
Aug | 4 | 7 | 11 |
Aug | 4 | 7 | 11 |
Sept | 7 | 5 | 12 |
Oct | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Nov | 4 | 8 | 12 |
Dec | 5 | 5 | 10 |
Total | 61 | 71 | 132 |
% | 46.2% | 53.8% | 100% |
Kislik,E (2361) – Szalanczy,E (2259)
Sicilian Dragon 9.0-0-0 a5[B76]
FSIM December 2012 Budapest HUN (5.5), 06.12.2012
Position 1
Black has declined the normal central break(…d5) in favor of the rare flank advance …a5-a4. How should white play now?
White to Play
Position 2
The position is a bit more defined now after 19…ed. How should white play now? What about taking the d-pawn?
White to Play
Position 3
Black is fully active after 24…Re8 but so is white. Material favors white with a knight for two pawns but the queenside is shattered. Black has activity on the e-file and the dark squares and is well placed to resist. How should white continue?
White to Play