Monthly Archives: September 2016
Art Pub Open U2200 2016 Rd1
Quite a few upsets as usual. Nobody is safe.
Results-Round 1
Bo. | No. | Name | Rtg | Pts. | Result | Pts. | Name | Rtg | No. | ||||
1 | 49 | Fule Simon | 1746 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Piroska Istvan | 2199 | 1 | ||||
2 | 2 | Kovacs Marton | 2150 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Kovacs Patrik Zsolt | 1743 | 50 | ||||
3 | 51 | Lakatos Tamas | 1739 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Markos Adam | 2133 | 3 | ||||
4 | 4 | Nemeth Miklos | 2133 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Palczert Miklos Dr. | 1735 | 52 | ||||
5 | 53 | Koltai Daniel | 1734 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Kovacs Istvan | 2122 | 5 | ||||
6 | 6 | Laszlo Imre | 2113 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Di Giovanni Vilmos | 1713 | 54 | ||||
7 | 55 | Virag Balint | 1706 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Forgacs Attila | 2112 | 7 | ||||
8 | 8 | Szekeres Tibor | 2109 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Bakonyi Arpad Dr. | 1703 | 56 | ||||
9 | 58 | Firnigel Janos | 1698 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | FM | Szollosi Laszlo | 2099 | 9 | |||
10 | 10 | Fodor Balazs | 2089 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Tancsa Tamas | 1698 | 59 | ||||
11 | 60 | Czimer Jozsef | 1696 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Kokeny Norbert Adrian | 2077 | 11 | ||||
12 | 12 | Sandor Tamas | 2077 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Pasti Anna | 1693 | 62 | ||||
13 | 63 | Erseki Aron | 1692 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Szabo Marton Mihaly | 2067 | 13 | ||||
14 | 14 | Bodrogi Mihaly | 2066 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Kratzmajer Akos Gyorgy | 1678 | 65 | ||||
15 | 67 | Muranyi Geza | 1660 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Mester Attila | 2045 | 15 | ||||
16 | 16 | AIM | Ongut Tamas Gunes | 2011 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Toth Nikoletta | 1659 | 68 | |||
17 | 69 | Szilagyi Adam | 1653 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Kovacs Geza | 2002 | 17 | ||||
18 | 18 | Horvath Kristof | 1995 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Sulyok Eszter | 1637 | 70 | ||||
19 | 71 | Pervai Laszlo | 1633 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Molnar Laszlo | 1988 | 19 | ||||
20 | 20 | Schubert Gyula | 1980 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Saar Patrik | 1627 | 72 | ||||
21 | 73 | Csajbok Levente Tamas | 1626 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Karacsonyi Gellert | 1978 | 21 | ||||
22 | 22 | Kovacs Gabor Etele | 1974 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Szemelyi Balazs | 1618 | 74 | ||||
23 | 75 | Forgacs Andras | 1617 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Somogyi Gabor | 1961 | 23 | ||||
24 | 24 | Yip Michael | 1938 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Daroczi Donat | 1613 | 76 | ||||
25 | 77 | Bilku Andras | 1604 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Szabo Zoltan | 1935 | 25 | ||||
26 | 27 | Juhasz Agoston | 1902 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Chowaniec Artur | 1603 | 78 | ||||
27 | 79 | Nemeth Csaba | 1603 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Erseki Tamara | 1899 | 28 | ||||
28 | 29 | Dibusz Domonkos | 1880 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Varga Boldizsar | 1572 | 80 | ||||
29 | 81 | Popovics Agnes | 1564 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Gal Janos | 1870 | 30 | ||||
30 | 31 | Schwarczenberger Csongor | 1860 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Seres Tibor | 1562 | 82 | ||||
31 | 83 | Karko Balint | 1560 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Balogh Lajos | 1858 | 32 | ||||
32 | 33 | Geher Koppany | 1857 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Videki Imre | 1558 | 84 | ||||
33 | 85 | Papp Andrea | 1557 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Birovecz Ben Jordan | 1851 | 34 | ||||
34 | 35 | Mako Zoltan | 1850 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Sandor Levente | 1548 | 86 | ||||
35 | 87 | Baski Barnabas | 1540 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Forgacs Attila Jr. | 1836 | 36 | ||||
36 | 37 | Kalmar Karoly | 1827 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Rona Andras | 1540 | 88 | ||||
37 | 89 | Ongut Selcuk | 1528 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Pasti Aron | 1799 | 38 | ||||
38 | 39 | Neszmenyi Zoltan | 1793 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Bolyki Istvan | 1515 | 90 | ||||
39 | 91 | Monduk Ferenc | 1509 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Nagy Gabor | 1789 | 40 | ||||
40 | 41 | Szucs Edina | 1776 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Karacsonyi Kata | 1498 | 92 | ||||
41 | 93 | Fabian Laszlo | 1489 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Purak Zoltan | 1765 | 43 | ||||
42 | 44 | Bartuszek Andras | 1760 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Sulyok Istvan | 1459 | 95 | ||||
43 | 97 | Maga Peter | 1408 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Bernath Bence | 1760 | 45 | ||||
44 | 46 | Szendeff Miklos | 1756 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Palczert Matyas | 1389 | 98 | ||||
45 | 99 | Zakar Adam | 1384 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Szurkos Andras | 1754 | 47 | ||||
46 | 48 | Safar Istvan | 1753 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Moricz Nadja | 1381 | 100 | ||||
47 | 101 | Czipp Janos | 1356 | 0 | 1 | bye |
U1600 Results-Round 1
Bo. | No. | Name | Rtg | Pts. | Result | Pts. | Name | Rtg | No. | ||||
1 | 1 | Szivak Andras | 1534 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Stickl Milan | 1194 | 38 | ||||
2 | 39 | Colwell Lennox James | 1190 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Szabo A. Martin | 1467 | 2 | ||||
3 | 4 | Vamosi Peter Istvan | 1459 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Sapi Andras Zoltan | 1176 | 40 | ||||
4 | 41 | Koltai Anna | 1172 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Szabo Balazs | 1442 | 5 | ||||
5 | 6 | Dan Anna | 1403 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Becsei Attila | 1160 | 42 | ||||
6 | 43 | Fekete Laszlo | 1159 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Sandor Adam David | 1393 | 7 | ||||
7 | 8 | Toth Peter | 1383 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Pervai Laszlo | 1158 | 44 | ||||
8 | 45 | Szabo Tamas | 1140 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Czagler Laszlo | 1372 | 9 | ||||
9 | 10 | Bodo Norbert | 1357 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Geher Bottyan | 1131 | 46 | ||||
10 | 47 | Makay Mark Janos | 1131 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Buri Petra | 1355 | 12 | ||||
11 | 13 | Szalay-Ocsak Bank | 1350 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Lokos Viktoria | 1126 | 48 | ||||
12 | 49 | Kovacs Reka | 1123 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Horvath Zoltan | 1334 | 14 | ||||
13 | 15 | Koller Jozsef Denes | 1321 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Kovacs Liliana | 1121 | 50 | ||||
14 | 51 | Moricz Karmen | 1113 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Kolozsvary Miklos | 1321 | 16 | ||||
15 | 18 | Moczar Sebestyen | 1316 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Kreiter Lilla | 1110 | 52 | ||||
16 | 53 | Nagy Sebestyen | 1104 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Sandor Anna Luca | 1314 | 19 | ||||
17 | 20 | Bodo Boglarka | 1313 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Karacsonyi Luca | 1089 | 54 | ||||
18 | 55 | Toth Barnabas | 1075 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Makai Bence | 1297 | 21 | ||||
19 | 22 | Moczar Benedek | 1294 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Kissebesi Mate | 1060 | 56 | ||||
20 | 57 | Szoboszlai Lehel Sandor | 1053 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Rado David | 1294 | 23 | ||||
21 | 24 | Gulacsi Donat Ferenc | 1278 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Karacsonyi Bank | 1042 | 58 | ||||
22 | 59 | Nagy Jacint | 1040 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Buri Kata | 1275 | 25 | ||||
23 | 26 | Szarka Rego | 1273 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Biro Daniel | 0 | 60 | ||||
24 | 61 | Colwell Elliott Reece | 0 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Kapicakova Lucia | 1269 | 27 | ||||
25 | 28 | Fulop Peter Benjamin | 1263 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Foldes Marton Gabor | 0 | 62 | ||||
26 | 63 | Hajdu Marton Abris | 0 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Csoka Nikolett | 1257 | 29 | ||||
27 | 30 | Magyar Erik Ferenc | 1256 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Kosik Vince | 0 | 64 | ||||
28 | 65 | Mathe Gergely | 0 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Nagy Daniel | 1252 | 31 | ||||
29 | 33 | Giang Tran Nam | 1247 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Pakozdi Artur Ferenc | 0 | 66 | ||||
30 | 67 | Polgar Botond Istvan | 0 | 0 | 0 – 1 | 0 | Szoboszlai Csongor | 1236 | 34 | ||||
31 | 35 | Farkas Otto Jr. | 1230 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Rado Peter | 0 | 68 | ||||
32 | 69 | Saar Istvan Harry | 0 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Onodi Tamas | 1208 | 36 | ||||
33 | 37 | Veress Csongor | 1202 | 0 | 1 – 0 | 0 | Toth Timea | 0 | 70 |
Gallery
Art Pub FIDE Open Oct-2016
More chess is coming to Budapest. So far around 160 players registered and at least one tourist.
More details and info from Hungarian Federation.
A verseny helyszíne:
Art Pub díszterme, 1203 Budapest, Lajtha László u. 2. http://art-pub.hu/
A verseny időpontja: 2016. szeptember 30. – október 2.
Versenyforma, program:
Svájci rendszer két csoportban, aktuális FIDE szabályok szerint, számítógépes párosítással. (Swiss Manager)
„A” csoport: 2200 élő alatti: 2 x 70 perc valamint lépésenként 30 mp.
„B” csoport: 1600 élő alatti: 2 x 70 perc valamint lépésenként 30 mp.
Kötelező regisztráció: 2016. szeptember 30. péntek 15 órától 16:30-ig Megnyitó: 2016. szeptember 30. 16:30
Eredményhirdetés: 2016. október 2. 16:30 Várakozási idő 30 perc!
- Sept 30: Round 1 16:45
- October 1: 3 rounds(0900/1300/1600)
- October 2: 2 rounds(0900/1300)
U1600-Starting Rank
Global Chess Festival Coming October 8, 2016
More info Global Chess Festival and Chessbase Report
“Chess is a sport, a game, entertainment and an educational tool, and with its diversity it can connect people. That is why we believe that in chess, all generations can find a collective fun experience. During the past decade the Global Chess Festival has become a prestigious social event with full-day family programs built around the mysterious board game…”

GM Judit Polgar
- Date 08 October 2016, Saturday
- LocationC astle Garden Bazaar
- Event name Global Chess Festival 2016 Budapest
- Event’s address Buda Castle, Budapest Ybl Miklós area, H-1013
- Organizer Judit Polgar Chess Foundation
- Website thejpcf.com
TWIC 1142 Sept 26-2016
Some games from TWIC.
Anton Guijarro,D-Banusz,T
Queen’s Gambit Accepted(D20) 3.e4 Nc6
3.e4 is Avurkh’s new recommendation for White in 1.d4 Vol1B(Quality Chess 2016) just published.
Black went for sharp counterplay but White was more than ready.
After 15..fe
Vovk-Ponizil
Grunfeld Exchange 8.Be3(D85)
After 16.a4!?(Diagram)
White ground out a win with some help from Black but the start was an interesting minority attack with 16.a4
After 16.a4
After 26..Rb5(Diagram)
Black is down a pawn and even after ..Rb2 keeping the rook active Black just could not generate any counterplay as f2 was secured very conveniently by White’s bishop.
After 26..Rb5
Cheparinov-Harikrishna
Queen’s Indian/Closed Catalan Hybrid(E15)
Black played a patient waiting game and defended against White’s typical queenside majority and was ultimately rewarded.
After 45.Kb4(Diagram)
The Q+B battery has been neutralised but the kingside pawn arrangement and now the Q+N tandem has a chance to be effective as Nc5 has a stable outpost.
After 45.Kb4
More Rook Endings(Please!): The Steckner Position
All rook endings are drawn-someone
Example 9-158 Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual
White to Play(Diagram)
White has an extra pawn but Black’s rook is in an ideal defensive position, behind the passed pawn and targeting the f-pawn.
What does White do now? and what is the objective evaluation?
White to Play
Warning: You either know this or you don’t. This is very hard without prior knowledge.
The Tedious World of Rook Endings
4 Pawns vs 3 Pawns with All the Pawns on the Same Side
Most players know this is a theoretical draw. Let’s have a closer look at the examples in Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual.
Korchnoi-Antoshin USSR ch 1954(Diagram)
If Black were on the move, the standard drawing plan is ..h5 followed by ..g6 and then trade off pawns whenever possible for the draw.
White to play
so anticipating the coming ..h5, White played 1.h5
White to Play
After 1.h5(diagram)
Black to play
So is this a draw? or can White squeeze out a win?
Black to Play
In order to grasp what is going on, knowledge of three other positions in needed
Position 1
Black to Play(Diagram)
This is a well-known standard draw type of position.
Black to Play
1..h5! is the key move and rear attacks by the black rook is the key defensive method.
Position 2
Botvinnik-Najdorf Moscow ol 1956
White to Play(Diagram)
This is a winning position for White.
The e4-e5 advance cannot be prevented and the weak light squares make it easy for the white king to infiltrate further and attack the backward g-pawn(with Kg6 to start with)
White to Play
1.Ra5 starts the winning process
Position 3
Capablanca-Yates Hastings 1930/31
White to Play(Diagram)
The winning plan is
-transfer the rook to the 8th rank
-f4-f5-f6+
White to Play
1.Rd6 is the optimal solution
And now back to the original question
Korchnoi-Antoshin USSR ch 1954
After 1.h5(Diagram)
Black to play and what result?
In the game after mutual errors, White eventually won. The analysis was quite confusing and I had to take quite a long time to get a better understanding.
Black to Play
1..Ra5! draws
The defensive method is
-provoke g3-g4(completely not obvious why)
-prevent e4-e5 with ..f6(key move)
-..Kg8-h7 to prevent Kg6 infiltration(also not obvious)
-side and rear attacks on the pawns.
Checking Negi 1.e4 vs Sicilian III
1.e4 vs The Sicilian III-Negi(Quality Chess 2016)
This is another must have book for 1.e4 players and Sicilian defenders.
- Ch 1-7 Taimanov(4..Nc6)
- Ch 8-14 Kan (4..e6)
- Ch 15-18 Scheveningen Keres Attack
- Ch 19-22 Sidelines
Here is sample line from Chapter 21 2..e6 Sidelines
After 8.ef(Diagram)
Negi gives 8..ab leading to a clear advantage for White, citing Hansen-Jiang Montreal 2012.
Theory has marched on as 8..Bxf2+ was played in Szabo,G-Mihok,O Hun Ch 2016 which was an improvement.
After 8.ef
After 14..gf(Diagram) of the Szabo-Mihok game
The game continued with 15.Bxb5+ and was eventually drawn but I propose 15.Qxd5N as an improvement(on the improvement) and White is slightly better
After 14..gf
It’s a nice book but I don’t play 1.e4 so that is all the work I feel like doing on this line.
Checking Avrukh-1.d4 Vol1B
The tedious task of creating and checking files continues with the new Avrukh repertoire book 1.d4 The Queen’s Gambit Volume 1B(Quality Chess 2016)
396 pages.
- Ch 1-6 QGA 3.e4
- Ch 7- 18 Slav 4.e3
- Ch 19-24 Minor Lines
Here is an example chapter
Position 1
After 16.Bd2(diagram)
Avrukh’s sample line gives 16..Nc3?! leading to a clear advantage for White.
After 16.Bd2
I suggest 16..Rfc8= as an improvement.
Position 2
After 11.Bd4(Diagram)
Avrukh gives 11..f6 but 11..Nf6 bringing out a piece makes more sense to me.
After 11.Bd4
This is a must have book for 1.d4 players or if you just like books and have a lot of spare time.
My Avrukh diet is one chapter per day, more if I can manage it.