Budapest TCh IV 2012-13 Semi-Final March 18 2013

RAC 4-Hort SE 2
RAC won the match but I managed to contribute only a winning position but not a winning result. In fact the result is quite hard to explain.

The Arbiter-Jenő Bácsi 
Everyone playing(almost)

Bokros,Istvan my opponent just before the round


Here’s my game.

Yip,M (2009) – Bokros,I (2140) 

Benoni 7.Bf4[A61]
BTCh Div IV, 18.03.2013



My opponent, Istvan Bokros has represented the ICSC (International
Commitee of Silent Chess) team at several Chess Olympiads.


Position 1
White has played well and is clearly winning with a healthy P+ and a mobile central pawn majority. My logic was as follows.

The BB pair is passive and the next phase is to neutralize counterplay and activate the bishops. What should white do now?

White to Play

32..Rxb7


Posted on March 19, 2013, in Budapest TCh 2012-13. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: