Elekes Dezső Emlékverseny 2015 Rd2

Results-Round 2

I lost another heartbreaking game against Piroska for an 0/2 start.

 

Bo. No. Name Rtg Pts. Result Pts. Name Rtg No.
1 1 IM Hujbert Florian 2439 1 1 – 0 1 Torok Tamas Titusz 2128 10
2 7 WIM Toth Lili Dr. 2144 1 0 – 1 1 IM Horvath David 2356 2
3 3 IM Szabolcsi Janos 2324 1 1 – 0 1 Marta Dominik 2097 12
4 9 Kormos Adam 2134 1 0 – 1 1 Balint Vilmos 2218 4
5 5 FM Koczo Kristof 2215 1 1 – 0 1 Molnar Laszlo 2057 14
6 28 Kaloczi Kristof 1702 1 ½ – ½ 1 WIM Varga Klara 2173 6
7 23 Gorog Almos 1850 ½ ½ – ½ 1 Horanyi Gabor 0 30
8 11 Gyurkovics Miklos 2102 0 0 – 1 ½ Berta Sandor 2141 8
9 13 Piroska Istvan 2094 0 1 – 0 0 Yip Michael 1919 20
10 15 Zoldy Robert 2018 0 1 – 0 0 Geher Laszlo 1873 21
11 25 Hegedus Peter Dr 1822 0 0 – 1 0 Bodrogi Mihaly 2016 16
12 17 WIM Fuad Kamel Jamaliah Natalie 2013 0 1 – 0 0 Geher Koppany 1854 22
13 27 Forgacs Andras 1709 0 1 – 0 0 Fodor Balazs 1950 18
14 19 Geher Jozsef 1929 0 0 – 1 0 Szep Janos 1831 24
15 29 Baranyai Tamas 1633 0 1 bye
16 26 Kelemen Szabolcs 1730 1 0 not paired

Yip-Koczo Round 1

Somehow I found a way to lost the following position after 28..Bf6(diagram). I was pretty happy with the bishop pair and Black having a very oddly placed knight on a7.

Yip-Koczo after 28..Bf6

Rd2 Piroska-Yip

I continued my opening debate in the 3..Qd6 Scandinavian with Piroska. After checking over the previous encounters, there seemed no reason to decline the duel as my positions were quite satisfactory.

Today’s inspirational preparation included

After 24.bc(diagram)

Piroska-Yip After 24.bc

Now I continued with some creative play with 24..e3!? but lost my way an a tense but equal game later on.

After 28.Qxe1(diagram)

After 28.Qxe1

I should have continued with 28..Qb3 to regroup the queen with ..Qe6 to help defend the kingside. However I continued with 28..h6?(Black cannot spare this tempo to give the king some luft) and there was uncomfortable pressure after 29.Be7 Nb8 30.Qe5 Nd7 31.Qe4(diagram)

After 31.Qe4

Black had to play 31..g6 to stay in the game but sadly I rejected it for the wrong reason. I blundered with 31..Nb8?? and quickly fell to an attack after 32.Bxf8 Kf8 33.Qe5!(dagram) Whites Q+N tandem are much better coordinated than Black’s Q+N.

After 33.Qe5

The game did not last much longer after 33..f6 34.Qd6+ Kf7 35.Qd8 Kg6 36.Qe8+ Kh7 37.Ne7 h5 38.Qxh5 mate. Sadly I missed the mate.

Rank Round 2

Rk. SNo Name FED Rtg Pts.  TB1  TB2  TB3 n w-we K rtg+/-
1 1 IM Hujbert Florian HUN 2439 2.0 2.0 2.00 3.0 2 0.22 10 2.2
2 IM Horvath David HUN 2356 2.0 2.0 2.00 3.0 2 0.35 10 3.5
3 3 IM Szabolcsi Janos HUN 2324 2.0 1.0 1.00 3.0 2 0.31 10 3.1
4 Balint Vilmos HUN 2218 2.0 1.0 1.00 3.0 2 0.54 20 10.8
5 FM Koczo Kristof HUN 2215 2.0 1.0 1.00 3.0 2 0.44 20 8.8
6 28 Kaloczi Kristof HUN 1702 1.5 2.5 1.75 2.5 2 1.34 40 53.6
7 30 Horanyi Gabor HUN 0 1.5 2.0 1.50 2.5 2
8 6 WIM Varga Klara HUN 2173 1.5 1.5 0.75 2.5 2 -0.27 20 -5.4
9 8 Berta Sandor HUN 2141 1.5 1.0 0.50 2.0 2 0.10 40 4.0
10 23 Gorog Almos HUN 1850 1.0 3.0 1.50 1.5 1 0.35 40 14.0
11 9 Kormos Adam HUN 2134 1.0 3.0 1.00 2.0 2 -0.24 20 -4.8
12 Marta Dominik HUN 2097 1.0 3.0 1.00 2.0 2 -0.12 40 -4.8
13 14 Molnar Laszlo HUN 2057 1.0 2.5 0.50 2.0 2 -0.21 20 -4.2
14 7 WIM Toth Lili Dr. HUN 2144 1.0 2.0 0.00 2.0 2 -0.07 20 -1.4
10 Torok Tamas Titusz HUN 2128 1.0 2.0 0.00 2.0 2 0.00 20 0.0
26 Kelemen Szabolcs HUN 1730 1.0 2.0 0.00 2.0 1 0.90 40 36.0
17 16 Bodrogi Mihaly HUN 2016 1.0 2.0 0.00 1.0 2 0.17 20 3.4
17 WIM Fuad Kamel Jamaliah Natalie JOR 2013 1.0 2.0 0.00 1.0 2 0.17 20 3.4
19 13 Piroska Istvan HUN 2094 1.0 1.5 0.00 1.0 2 -0.65 20 -13.0
15 Zoldy Robert HUN 2018 1.0 1.5 0.00 1.0 1 0.31 20 6.2
21 29 Baranyai Tamas HUN 1633 1.0 1.0 0.50 1.0 1 -0.08 40 -3.2
22 24 Szep Janos HUN 1831 1.0 1.0 0.00 1.0 2 0.49 40 19.6
27 Forgacs Andras HUN 1709 1.0 1.0 0.00 1.0 2 0.71 40 28.4
24 11 Gyurkovics Miklos HUN 2102 0.0 3.0 0.00 0.0 2 -1.35 20 -27.0
18 Fodor Balazs HUN 1950 0.0 3.0 0.00 0.0 2 -0.90 40 -36.0
19 Geher Jozsef HUN 1929 0.0 3.0 0.00 0.0 2 -0.79 20 -15.8
20 Yip Michael CAN 1919 0.0 3.0 0.00 0.0 2 -0.42 20 -8.4
28 21 Geher Laszlo HUN 1873 0.0 2.5 0.00 0.0 2 -0.46 20 -9.2
29 22 Geher Koppany HUN 1854 0.0 2.0 0.00 0.0 2 -0.45 40 -18.0
25 Hegedus Peter Dr HUN 1822 0.0 2.0 0.00 0.0 2 -0.39 20 -7.8

 

Advertisements

Posted on July 20, 2015, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: