I stumbled my way to a win on time for MTK III but a win is a win.

Terbe,Z(left)

Terbe,J (left column at front)

I. osztály, Lilienthal csoport
Fabulon-Lombik – SENSE I 10:2
Sirály I – Vasas SC II 7,5:4,5
Barcza GSC I – Tabáni Spartacus II 9:3
Palota Sakk I – Mattolda SSC I 8,5:3,5
Pénzügyőr SE III – Újpesti KSE I 7:5
MTK Budapest III – BEAC II 8:4

A SENSE I. csapata kötelező ifjúsági játékos kontumálásáért 1 büntetőpontot kapott.

II.osztály, Bilek csoport
SENSE II – Csepeli TK 1,5:10,5
Pestszentlőrinc II – Törekvés SE 6:6
Barcza GSC II – Aquaréna KSC III 4,5:7,5
HÜSI SC II – Mattolda SSC II 10,5:1,5
A. Láng MKKE – Sárkány DSE II 8,5:3,5
MTK Budapest IV – BEAC III 5,5:6,5

III. osztály, Szén csoport
Újpesti KSE II – MLTC II 8:4
Pestszentimre – MTK Budapest V 4:8
Honvéd ASE III – Pénzügyőr SE IV 9:3
Sirály II – Sárkány DSE III 8:4
Aquaréna KSC V – Palota Sakk II 5:7
HÜSI SC III – Rákosliget 5:7
Barcza GSC III – ATTE-ARISZ 8:4
BEAC IV – Aquaréna KSC IV 4,5:6,5

Yip-Zlotor Board 12

After 35..Nf6(Diagram)

I was analyzing 36.Nd6 and 36.Nd6 which seemed reasonable but found an even faster way to win.

After 35..Nf6

I pointed to the clock and claimed a win on time.

Home analysis showed the final position was winning and also showed how little I noticed that was correct. But my exchange blunder was not as bad as I initially thought

After 21..Nc4(Diagram)

I noticed the ..g4 followed by ..Nd2 fork idea and took decisive measures to avoid the pesky tactic.

After 21..Nc4

But 22.Qc2? was met with an equally tricky 22..Na3 with a fork anyway.