Budapest TCh 2019 Rd2
I contributed a win on board 11 but the original plan was for me to be board 12
The big team lost to the Tax Agency after suffering 3 upsets. One of our stronger players was unable to attend after a nasty emergency and I had to play up a board
I. osztály, Lilienthal csoport
Lombik-Fabulon – BEAC II 5,5:6,5
Barcza GSC I – SENSE I 9,5:2,5
Aquaréna KSC III – Palota Sakk I 10:2
Pénzügyőr SE III – MTK Budapest III 6,5:5,5
Tabáni Spartacus II – Vasas SC II 5:7
Sirály SE I – Újpesti KSE I 11:1
II. osztály, Bilek csoport
Hóbagoly SK – Sárkány DSE II 4,5:7,5
Barcza GSC II – A. Láng MKKE 5:7
Törekvés SE – Pestszentlőrinc II 5:7
TFSE – MTK Budapest IV 3:9
HÜSI SC II – Mattolda SSC I 3:9
Sirály SE II – Csepeli TK I 6,5:5,5
III. osztály, Szén csoport
Csepeli TK II – HÜSI SC III 1,5:10,5
Pestszentimre – MTK Budapest V 4,5:7,5
Pénzügyőr SE IV – ATTE-ARISZ 9:3
Sárkány DSE III – Újpesti KSE II 7,5:4,5
Palota Sakk II – BEAC III 2,5:9,5
Barcza GSC III – SENSE II 4:8
Aquaréna KSC IV – Mattolda SSC II 10,5:1,5
Rákosliget – ART 3F SE 5,5:6,5
Yip,M-Zoltan,A
Bogo-Catalan
BTCh 2019 Rd2.11
After 15..h5(Diagram)
Black’s kingside pawns have been compromised but White must still find a good plan
What do you recommend for White?
After 47..Qe5(Diagram)
White has every advantage possible, safer king, better structure, better minor pieces and control of the d-file
The game must still be won but there are many possible ways. I chose what I thought was the most logical, removing any chance at counterplay
World Youth Chess Championship India 2019
Player overview for HUN

| SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Pts. | Rk. | Group | |
| 9 | FM | Borhy Marcell | 2321 | HUN | 1 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 2,5 | 24 | Open U14 |
| 18 | Sulyok Eszter | 1893 | HUN | 1 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 2,5 | 23 | Girls U14 | |
| 17 | Juhasz Judit | 2004 | HUN | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3,0 | 9 | Girls U16 | |
| 30 | FM | Vanczak Tamas | 2327 | HUN | 1 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1,5 | 54 | Open U18 |
Pairings of the next round for HUN
| Rd. | Bo. | No. | Name | FED | Rtg | Pts. | Result | Pts. | Name | FED | Rtg | No. | ||||
| 5 | 14 | 9 | FM | Borhy Marcell | HUN | 2321 | 2½ | 2½ | Jain Kashish Manoj | IND | 1930 | 42 | ||||
| 5 | 13 | 55 | Karimli Zhala | AZE | 1490 | 2½ | 2½ | Sulyok Eszter | HUN | 1893 | 18 | |||||
| 5 | 6 | 17 | Juhasz Judit | HUN | 2004 | 3 | 3 | Zhang Xiao | CHN | 2053 | 10 | |||||
| 5 | 26 | 56 | Praloy Sahoo | IND | 1947 | 1½ | 1½ | FM | Vanczak Tamas | HUN | 2327 | 30 |
Results of the last round for HUN
| Rd. | Bo. | No. | Name | FED | Rtg | Pts. | Result | Pts. | Name | FED | Rtg | No. | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 21 | Poltorak Sebastian | POL | 2130 | 2½ | 1 – 0 | 2½ | FM | Borhy Marcell | HUN | 2321 | 9 | |||
| 4 | 13 | 18 | Sulyok Eszter | HUN | 1893 | 2 | ½ – ½ | 2 | AGM | Renganayaki V | IND | 1641 | 37 | |||
| 4 | 12 | 26 | FM | Jarocka Liwia | POL | 1899 | 2 | 0 – 1 | 2 | Juhasz Judit | HUN | 2004 | 17 | |||
| 4 | 21 | 30 | FM | Vanczak Tamas | HUN | 2327 | 1½ | 0 – 1 | 1½ | Gaurav Rajesh Zagade | IND | 2053 | 51 |
Player details for HUN
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Pts. | Res. | ||
| FM Borhy Marcell 2321 HUN Rp:2088 Pts. 2,5 | ||||||||
| 1 | 54 | CM | Mohamed Saeed Laily | 1836 | UAE | 1,0 | w 1 | |
| 2 | 36 | Sahakyan Aleks | 1991 | ARM | 1,5 | s ½ | ||
| 3 | 30 | Laux Dominik | 2015 | GER | 2,5 | w 1 | ||
| 4 | 21 | Poltorak Sebastian | 2130 | POL | 3,5 | s 0 | ||
| 5 | 42 | Jain Kashish Manoj | 1930 | IND | 2,5 | w | ||
| Sulyok Eszter 1893 HUN Rp:1708 Pts. 2,5 | ||||||||
| 1 | 58 | Dolakidze Mariam | 1473 | GEO | 1,5 | s 1 | ||
| 2 | 76 | Zubova Darja | 1255 | LAT | 2,0 | w 1 | ||
| 3 | 5 | Roebers Eline | 2083 | NED | 3,5 | s 0 | ||
| 4 | 37 | AGM | Renganayaki V | 1641 | IND | 2,5 | w ½ | |
| 5 | 55 | Karimli Zhala | 1490 | AZE | 2,5 | s | ||
| Juhasz Judit 2004 HUN Rp:2007 Pts. 3,0 | ||||||||
| 1 | 52 | Sargsyan Srbuhi | 1607 | ARM | 1,5 | w 1 | ||
| 2 | 56 | Shreetu Bhavikbhai Nandi | 1556 | IND | 1,5 | s 1 | ||
| 3 | 4 | WFM | Nurgali Nazerke | 2194 | KAZ | 4,0 | w 0 | |
| 4 | 26 | FM | Jarocka Liwia | 1899 | POL | 2,0 | s 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | Zhang Xiao | 2053 | CHN | 3,0 | w | ||
| FM Vanczak Tamas 2327 HUN Rp:2125 Pts. 1,5 | ||||||||
| 1 | 68 | Saypuri Srithan | 1833 | IND | 1,0 | s 1 | ||
| 2 | 9 | IM | Rahul Srivatshav P | 2460 | IND | 2,5 | w ½ | |
| 3 | 7 | IM | Pultinevicius Paulius | 2503 | LTU | 2,5 | s 0 | |
| 4 | 51 | Gaurav Rajesh Zagade | 2053 | IND | 2,5 | w 0 | ||
| 5 | 56 | Praloy Sahoo | 1947 | IND | 1,5 | s | ||
New Books Now Available from New in Chess
Now available from New in Chess

“Planning is of crucial importance in chess and yet this is an area that has not been well discussed or explained to ambitious players who wish to improve. A very well known saying in chess is “Better a bad plan than no plan at all”. Playing without a plan – effectively staggering from one move to the next – is a recipe for disaster. It is essential to have some kind of idea of what you are trying to achieve and how to go about it.
However, planning is not a straightforward matter. A good plan might be very short, lasting just two or three moves. Another plan might require almost an entire game to implement. A plan can be highly ambitious and complex or somewhat modest and simple. In chess, as in life, circumstances can change quickly and when they do, new plans are needed. How is a player expected to juggle all these different concepts while dealing with the immediate problems posed by the opponent’s most recent move?”
Chess Logic in Practice-IM Kislik,E

“Chess-players understand that it is vital to play logically, but often lack the methods needed to do so. In this book, renowned trainer Erik Kislik presents a wide range of specific concepts that will help them succeed. These include positional techniques, thinking methods, and modes of play to adopt when either better or worse.
Just the list of chapter titles shows how original Kislik’s presentation is. They include:
- Painfully Slow Moves
- Focal Points
- Reciprocal Logic
- Fighting against Centralized Pieces
- When Playing a Bad Move Wins a Good Game
- A Chronically Weak King
Throughout, the discussion is illustrated by a mass of examples from both recent elite chess and the play of Kislik and his students, showing how his themes cut across all levels of chess. After the book’s two main sections – Thinking Concepts and Positional Concepts – comes a section of exercises, again with a strikingly original theme: our task is simply to assess each position.”
TWIC 1299 Hungarians in Action
The latest issue of TWIC is now available
Sedlak-Medvegy
Queen’s Indian g3
28th TCh-CRO Div 1b 2019 Rd2.11
After 56..Ke7(Diagram)
White has the outside passer but the Na6 blockades it
What do you recommend for White?
BTCH 2019-20 Sept 29 Rd1
MTK did well but I contributed a loss
My form had been pretty good lately so today was a big disappointment
I. osztály, Lilienthal csoport
Sirály SE I – Lombik-Fabulon 7,5:4,5
Újpesti KSE I – Tabáni Spartacus II 3,5:8,5
Vasas SC II – Pénzügyőr SE III 2,5:9,5
MTK Budapest III – Aquaréna KSC III 9:3
Palota Sakk I – Barcza GSC I 3,5:8,5
SENSE I – BEAC II 6:6
II. osztály, Bilek csoport
Sirály SE II – Hóbagoly SK 8:4
Csepeli TK I – HÜSI SC II 6,5:5,5
Mattolda SSC I – TFSE 7:5
MTK Budapest IV – Törekvés SE 8,5:3,5
Pestszentlőrinc II – Barcza GSC II 5:7
A. Láng MKKE – Sárkány DSE II 2:10
III. osztály, Szén csoport
Újpesti KSE II – Pénzügyőr SE IV 1:11
ATTE-ARISZ – Pestszentimre 7,5:4,5
MTK Budapest V – Csepeli TK II 7:5
HÜSI SC III – Sirály SE III 1,5:10,5
Sárkány DSE III szabad
Rákosliget – Palota Sakk II 9:3
ART 3F SE – Aquaréna KSC IV 5:7
Mattolda SSC II – Barcza GSC III 5:7
SENSE II – BEAC III 5,5:6,
Yip-Varhaj
Czech Benoni
Board 2
After 13..Bf5(Diagram)
White has the obvious plan of controlling the e4-strongpoint
What do you recommend for White?
TWIC 1298 Nimzo Indian
Krysa-Flores
4.Qc2 b6 5.e4
94th ch-ARG 2019 Rd5
After 19.Qf5(Diagram)
White wants to take the g-pawn with check to start with
What do you recommend for Black?
TWIC 1298 Hungarians in Action
The latest issue of TWIC is now available
selected games features Terbe,J in Spain
Terbe,J-Guillo Longares
Maroczy Bind
Fuerteventura w Masters Rd2.2
After 17..Rb2(Diagram)
The Rb2 looks like a lost sheep but the b3-pawn is under attack
What do you recommend for White?
Chess Evolution 3-Yusupov(Quality Chess 2013)
I (re)did a couple of chapters(18,19) today

In Chess Evolution 3 Ch19 Exchanging Queens
I found alternative solutions to a couple of exercises but Yusupov gave me no points. (Good thing I passed the module)
Exercise 19-10
No hints
Exercise 19-12
No hints
TWIC 1297 Hungarians in Action
The latest issue of TWIC is now available
Gledura-Najer
Reti 2..d4
FIDE World Cup 2019 Rd1.2
After 19..exf4(Diagram)
White must decide how to recapture and/or do something about the attacked d3-pawn
What do you recommend for White?
XVIII. Rákosmente Open Sept 2019 Rd5
Final Ranking after 5 Rounds
| Rk. | SNo | Name | FED | Rtg | Pts. | TB1 | TB2 | TB3 | |
| 1 | 2 | Gubics Peter | HUN | 1990 | 4,5 | 16,5 | 14,0 | 0,0 | |
| 2 | 1 | FM | Koczo Kristof | HUN | 2065 | 4,0 | 16,0 | 12,5 | 0,0 |
| 3 | 7 | Horvath Csaba | HUN | 1810 | 3,5 | 15,5 | 10,0 | 0,0 | |
| 4 | 3 | Csalami Gabor | HUN | 1883 | 3,5 | 14,0 | 11,5 | 0,0 | |
| 5 | 4 | AIM | Szalay-Ocsak Bank | HUN | 1850 | 3,0 | 15,5 | 11,0 | 0,0 |
| 6 | 9 | WCM | Kovarikova Maria | SVK | 1772 | 3,0 | 13,0 | 11,0 | 0,0 |
| 7 | 10 | Sulcz Istvan | HUN | 1733 | 3,0 | 12,5 | 8,5 | 0,0 | |
| 8 | 14 | Gazsovics Bela | HUN | 1598 | 3,0 | 9,0 | 6,0 | 0,0 | |
| 9 | 13 | Szurkos Andras | HUN | 1623 | 2,5 | 13,5 | 7,5 | 0,0 | |
| 10 | 12 | Abraham Lajos | HUN | 1624 | 2,5 | 13,5 | 6,0 | 0,0 | |
| 11 | 5 | Tolnai Jozsef | HUN | 1834 | 2,5 | 13,0 | 8,0 | 0,0 | |
| 12 | 6 | Deli Kristof | HUN | 1831 | 2,5 | 12,0 | 8,5 | 0,0 | |
| 13 | 11 | Safar Istvan | HUN | 1708 | 2,5 | 11,5 | 6,5 | 0,0 | |
| 14 | 18 | ACM | Megyeri Martin | HUN | 1477 | 2,5 | 11,0 | 5,5 | 0,0 |
| 15 | 15 | Yadav Tarun | IND | 1595 | 2,0 | 11,0 | 6,0 | 0,0 | |
| 16 | 16 | Szoukup Istvan | HUN | 1549 | 1,5 | 13,5 | 5,5 | 0,0 | |
| 17 | 8 | Lakatos Andras | HUN | 1788 | 1,5 | 12,0 | 3,5 | 0,0 | |
| 18 | 20 | Farkas Imre | HUN | 1464 | 1,5 | 10,0 | 4,5 | 0,0 | |
| 19 | 21 | Molnar Dalma Reka | HUN | 1130 | 1,0 | 12,5 | 4,0 | 0,0 | |
| 20 | 17 | Timko Gyula | HUN | 1542 | 1,0 | 10,5 | 2,0 | 0,0 | |
| 21 | 19 | Makay Mark Janos | HUN | 1468 | 0,0 | 10,5 | 0,0 | 0,0 |
Final Ranking after 5 Rounds
Gubics was clear first with 4.5/5
| Rk. | SNo | Name | FED | Rtg | Pts. | TB1 | TB2 | TB3 | |
| 1 | 2 | Gubics Peter | HUN | 1990 | 4,5 | 16,5 | 14,0 | 0,0 | |
| 2 | 1 | FM | Koczo Kristof | HUN | 2065 | 4,0 | 16,0 | 12,5 | 0,0 |
| 3 | 7 | Horvath Csaba | HUN | 1810 | 3,5 | 15,5 | 10,0 | 0,0 | |
| 4 | 3 | Csalami Gabor | HUN | 1883 | 3,5 | 14,0 | 11,5 | 0,0 | |
| 5 | 4 | AIM | Szalay-Ocsak Bank | HUN | 1850 | 3,0 | 15,5 | 11,0 | 0,0 |
| 6 | 9 | WCM | Kovarikova Maria | SVK | 1772 | 3,0 | 13,0 | 11,0 | 0,0 |
| 7 | 10 | Sulcz Istvan | HUN | 1733 | 3,0 | 12,5 | 8,5 | 0,0 | |
| 8 | 14 | Gazsovics Bela | HUN | 1598 | 3,0 | 9,0 | 6,0 | 0,0 | |
| 9 | 13 | Szurkos Andras | HUN | 1623 | 2,5 | 13,5 | 7,5 | 0,0 | |
| 10 | 12 | Abraham Lajos | HUN | 1624 | 2,5 | 13,5 | 6,0 | 0,0 | |
| 11 | 5 | Tolnai Jozsef | HUN | 1834 | 2,5 | 13,0 | 8,0 | 0,0 | |
| 12 | 6 | Deli Kristof | HUN | 1831 | 2,5 | 12,0 | 8,5 | 0,0 | |
| 13 | 11 | Safar Istvan | HUN | 1708 | 2,5 | 11,5 | 6,5 | 0,0 | |
| 14 | 18 | ACM | Megyeri Martin | HUN | 1477 | 2,5 | 11,0 | 5,5 | 0,0 |
| 15 | 15 | Yadav Tarun | IND | 1595 | 2,0 | 11,0 | 6,0 | 0,0 | |
| 16 | 16 | Szoukup Istvan | HUN | 1549 | 1,5 | 13,5 | 5,5 | 0,0 | |
| 17 | 8 | Lakatos Andras | HUN | 1788 | 1,5 | 12,0 | 3,5 | 0,0 | |
| 18 | 20 | Farkas Imre | HUN | 1464 | 1,5 | 10,0 | 4,5 | 0,0 | |
| 19 | 21 | Molnar Dalma Reka | HUN | 1130 | 1,0 | 12,5 | 4,0 | 0,0 | |
| 20 | 17 | Timko Gyula | HUN | 1542 | 1,0 | 10,5 | 2,0 | 0,0 | |
| 21 | 19 | Makay Mark Janos | HUN | 1468 | 0,0 | 10,5 | 0,0 | 0,0 |










