Budapest Open 2020 Rd4
Round 4
Bo. | No. | Name | Rtg | Pts. | Result | Pts. | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 2 | FM | Orosz Andras | 2306 | 3 | ½ – ½ | 3 | Baski Barnabas | 2056 | 15 | |
2 | 16 | Gyurkovics Miklos | 2036 | 3 | 0 – 1 | 2½ | Karacsonyi Kata | 2004 | 20 | ||
3 | 6 | Pogany Zsombor | 2188 | 2½ | 1 – 0 | 2½ | Sulyok Eszter | 1939 | 30 | ||
4 | 29 | Fellegi Zoltan | 1941 | 2½ | 1 – 0 | 2½ | Karacsonyi Luca | 1658 | 54 | ||
5 | 8 | Torok Tamas Titusz | 2110 | 2½ | 0 – 1 | 2 | Polyik Peter | 2332 | 1 | ||
6 | 3 | Kormos Adam | 2279 | 2 | 1 – 0 | 2 | Kiss Mate Jozsef | 1994 | 22 | ||
7 | 23 | Yip Michael | 1993 | 2 | 1 – 0 | 2 | Markos Adam | 2219 | 5 | ||
8 | 24 | Csalami Gabor | 1986 | 2 | 0 – 1 | 2 | FM | Koczo Kristof | 2077 | 11 | |
9 | 18 | Nemeth Zalan | 2017 | 2 | 0 – 1 | 2 | Demjen Mark | 1974 | 25 | ||
10 | 28 | AIM | Daroczi Donat | 1941 | 2 | 0 – 1 | 2 | Lakatos Tamas | 2011 | 19 | |
11 | 31 | Gyenes Mate | 1926 | 2 | ½ – ½ | 2 | Matyassy Lazar | 2004 | 21 | ||
12 | 10 | FM | Magyar Otto | 2079 | 1½ | ½ – ½ | 1½ | Schreuder Peters Misja | 1925 | 32 | |
13 | 33 | Ilyes Peter | 1919 | 1½ | 0 – 1 | 1½ | Kovacs Istvan | 2062 | 13 | ||
14 | 14 | FM | Hradeczky Tamas | 2059 | 1½ | ½ – ½ | 1½ | IM | Eperjesi Laszlo Dr. | 2034 | 17 |
15 | 36 | FM | Letay Gyula | 1875 | 1½ | 0 – 1 | 1 | Fodor Balazs | 2154 | 7 | |
16 | 4 | IM | Farago Sandor | 2219 | 1 | 1 – 0 | 1 | Barsi Botond | 1860 | 39 | |
17 | 42 | Zoldy Robert | 1857 | 1 | 0 – 1 | 1 | Nemeth Miklos | 2081 | 9 | ||
18 | 26 | Valis Janos | 1966 | 1 | 0 – 1 | 1 | Bokorovics Bertalan | 1857 | 41 | ||
19 | 27 | AFM | Laszlo Csaba | 1955 | 1 | ½ – ½ | 1 | Nagy Gyorgy | 1852 | 44 | |
20 | 35 | Koltai Dora | 1897 | 1 | 0 – 1 | 1 | Pongo Istvan | 1655 | 56 | ||
21 | 55 | Monduk Laszlo | 1655 | 1 | 0 – 1 | 1 | Forgacs Andras | 1868 | 37 | ||
22 | 38 | Bellan Istvan | 1866 | 1 | 0 – 1 | 1 | Karacsonyi Bank | 1621 | 57 | ||
23 | 52 | Foldes Marton Gabor | 1698 | ½ | 1 – 0 | ½ | Merey Sandor | 1854 | 43 | ||
24 | 46 | Krizsany Laszlo Sr. | 1804 | ½ | ½ – ½ | ½ | Bolyki Istvan | 1799 | 47 | ||
25 | 48 | Szabo Marton Nandor | 1788 | ½ | 1 – 0 | ½ | AFM | Megyeri Martin | 1694 | 53 | |
26 | 34 | Bernula Istvan | 1911 | 0 | ½ – ½ | ½ | Pakh Alex | 1833 | 45 | ||
27 | 51 | Csernyik Mark | 1735 | 0 | ½ – ½ | 0 | Mihaly Zoltan | 1755 | 49 |
Group B-Round 4
Bo. | No. | Name | Rtg | Pts. | Result | Pts. | Name | Rtg | No. | ||
1 | 6 | Zsatkovics Endre | 1620 | 3 | 1 – 0 | 3 | Jonas David | 1425 | 19 | ||
2 | 2 | Varga Balazs | 1690 | 2½ | 0 – 1 | 2½ | Deak-Sala Emilia | 1622 | 5 | ||
3 | 4 | Kubik Anna Zsofia | 1637 | 2 | 1 – 0 | 2½ | Csermely Zoltan | 1548 | 13 | ||
4 | 12 | Mathe Gergely | 1551 | 2 | 0 – 1 | 2 | Szendeff Miklos | 1693 | 1 | ||
5 | 14 | Varga Boldizsar | 1504 | 2 | 0 – 1 | 2 | Piskoti Laszlo | 1618 | 7 | ||
6 | 20 | Tereshchuk Richard | 1384 | 2 | 1 – 0 | 2 | Vamosi Peter Istvan | 1583 | 9 | ||
7 | 11 | Fabian Laszlo | 1562 | 2 | 1 – 0 | 2 | Farkas Imre | 1480 | 15 | ||
8 | 25 | Schrenk Jazmin | 1297 | 1½ | 0 – 1 | 2 | Defend Balint | 1465 | 16 | ||
9 | 27 | Hangay Oliver | 1274 | 1 | 0 – 1 | 1 | Szurkos Andras | 1687 | 3 | ||
10 | 17 | AFM | Szuhorukov Marcell | 1452 | 1 | 1 – 0 | 1 | Kasa Barnabas | 1047 | 31 | |
11 | 18 | ACM | Hangay Tibor | 1429 | 1 | 1 – 0 | 1 | Marton-John Almos Kiran | 0 | 33 | |
12 | 32 | Bod Peter | 0 | 1 | ½ – ½ | 1 | Kolozsvary Miklos | 1366 | 22 | ||
13 | 34 | Mathe Levente Nandor | 0 | 1 | 0 – 1 | 1 | La Barbera Marcello | 1297 | 24 | ||
14 | 21 | Varhegyi Abel | 1381 | ½ | 1 – 0 | 1 | Deak-Sala Daniel | 1116 | 30 | ||
15 | 10 | La Barbera Manfredi | 1568 | ½ | 1 – 0 | ½ | Berla Zoltan Mate | 1209 | 28 | ||
16 | 23 | Szarvas Nora Orsolya | 1308 | ½ | 1 – 0 | ½ | Bod Marton | 1279 | 26 |
GM Ranking crosstable after Round 4
Rk. | Name | Rtg | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Pts. | TB1 | TB2 | ||
1 | GM | Kantor Gergely | 2530 | HUN | * | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 3,0 | 0,0 | 4,75 | ||||||
2 | IM | Csonka Balazs | 2498 | HUN | ½ | * | ½ | 1 | ½ | 2,5 | 0,5 | 4,50 | ||||||
3 | GM | Aczel Gergely | 2511 | HUN | ½ | * | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2,5 | 0,5 | 3,25 | ||||||
4 | IM | Nayhebaver Martin | 2482 | SVK | ½ | 1 | * | ½ | 2,0 | 0,0 | 4,75 | |||||||
5 | GM | Horvath Adam | 2488 | HUN | 0 | * | ½ | ½ | 1 | 2,0 | 0,0 | 3,25 | ||||||
IM | Petenyi Tamas | 2436 | SVK | ½ | * | ½ | 1 | 2,0 | 0,0 | 3,25 | ||||||||
7 | FM | Gungl Theo | 2360 | GER | 0 | ½ | ½ | * | ½ | 1,5 | 0,0 | 2,75 | ||||||
8 | IM | Horvath Dominik | 2438 | AUT | 0 | ½ | ½ | * | ½ | 1,5 | 0,0 | 2,50 | ||||||
9 | FM | Karacsonyi Gellert | 2292 | HUN | 0 | 0 | ½ | * | 1 | 1,5 | 0,0 | 1,25 | ||||||
10 | FM | Persanyi Barnabas | 2370 | HUN | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | * | 0,5 | 0,0 | 1,25 |
IM Ranking crosstable after Round 4
Rk. | Name | Rtg | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Pts. | TB1 | TB2 | ||
1 | FM | Bodi Tibor | 2346 | HUN | * | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 3,5 | 0,0 | 5,75 | ||||||
2 | FM | Gombocz Ferenc Jr. | 2209 | HUN | * | 0 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 2,5 | 0,0 | 4,50 | ||||||
3 | FM | Paszewski Mateusz | 2243 | POL | 0 | 1 | * | ½ | 1 | 2,5 | 0,0 | 3,75 | ||||||
4 | GM | Farago Ivan | 2348 | HUN | * | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2,5 | 0,0 | 3,50 | ||||||
5 | FM | Zentai Peter | 2304 | HUN | ½ | ½ | * | 1 | 0 | 2,0 | 0,0 | 4,00 | ||||||
6 | FM | Mouhamad Joachim | 2272 | FRA | 0 | 0 | * | 1 | 1 | 2,0 | 0,0 | 2,00 | ||||||
7 | FM | Lyell Mark | 2302 | ENG | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | ½ | 1,5 | 0,0 | 3,25 | ||||||
Geher Koppany | 2326 | HUN | 0 | ½ | 1 | * | 0 | 1,5 | 0,0 | 3,25 | ||||||||
9 | IM | Paschall William | 2329 | USA | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | * | 1,5 | 0,0 | 2,25 | ||||||
10 | IM | Nemeth Zoltan | 2210 | HUN | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | * | 0,5 | 0,0 | 1,75 |
I won a tough game
Yip-Markos,A
English opening
Budapest Open A 2020 Rd4
After 27..Rae8(Diagram)
White had nice position compensation for the exchange(strong Nd5, broken enemy kingside etc) but no forced win. I kept the pressure up and tried to find little threats and eventually got an attack going
After 34..Re6(Diagram)
White has broken through and is now looking to finish as efficiently as possible
Posted on August 24, 2020, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.
Leave a comment
Comments 0