Category Archives: Uncategorized

TWIC 1142 Sept 26-2016

Some games from TWIC.

Anton Guijarro,D-Banusz,T

Queen’s Gambit Accepted(D20) 3.e4 Nc6

3.e4 is Avurkh’s new recommendation for White in 1.d4 Vol1B(Quality Chess 2016) just published.

Black went for sharp counterplay but White was more than ready.

After 15..fe

After 15..fe

Vovk-Ponizil

Grunfeld Exchange 8.Be3(D85)

After 16.a4!?(Diagram)

White ground out a win with some help from Black but the start was an interesting minority attack with 16.a4

After 16.a4

After 16.a4

After 26..Rb5(Diagram)

Black is down a pawn and even after ..Rb2 keeping the rook active Black just could not generate any counterplay as f2 was secured very conveniently by White’s bishop.

After 26..Rb5

After 26..Rb5

Cheparinov-Harikrishna

Queen’s Indian/Closed Catalan Hybrid(E15)

Black played a patient waiting game and defended against White’s typical queenside majority and was ultimately rewarded.

After 45.Kb4(Diagram)

The Q+B battery has been neutralised but the kingside pawn arrangement and now the Q+N tandem has a chance to be effective as Nc5 has a stable outpost.

After 45.Kb4

After 45.Kb4

 

Casual Chess :)

Malta Friends

Clarence and family stopped by for some chess.

The draw offer was declined.

Ocean played well but lost on time.

20160916_151201

Ocean(left)

20160916_151216

20160916_151221

20160916_151226

20160916_151246

Clarence just played in the Olympiad for Malta and stopped over in Budapest on the way back to Malta.

20160916_151257

20160916_151305

20160916_151311

20160916_151321

More Rook Endings(Please!): The Steckner Position

All rook endings are drawn-someone

Example 9-158 Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual

White to Play(Diagram)

White has an extra pawn but Black’s rook is in an ideal defensive position, behind the passed pawn and targeting the f-pawn.

What does White do now? and what is the objective evaluation?

White to Play

White to Play

Warning: You either know this or you don’t. This is very hard without prior knowledge.

The Tedious World of Rook Endings

4 Pawns vs 3 Pawns with All the Pawns on the Same Side

Most players know this is a theoretical draw.  Let’s have a closer look at the examples in Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual.

 

Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual

Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual

20160916_085957

 

Korchnoi-Antoshin USSR ch 1954(Diagram)

If Black were on the move, the standard drawing plan is ..h5 followed by ..g6 and then trade off pawns whenever possible for the draw.

White to play

so anticipating the coming ..h5, White played 1.h5

White to Play

White to Play

After 1.h5(diagram)

Black to play

So is this a draw? or can White squeeze out a win?

Black to Play

Black to Play

In order to grasp what is going on, knowledge of three other positions in needed

Position 1

Petrosian-Keres USSR ch 1951

Black to Play(Diagram)

This is a well-known standard draw type of position.

Black to Play

Black to Play

1..h5! is the key move and rear attacks by the black rook is the key defensive method.

Position 2

Botvinnik-Najdorf Moscow ol 1956

White to Play(Diagram)

This is a winning position for White.
The e4-e5 advance cannot be prevented and the weak light squares make it easy for the white king to infiltrate further and attack the backward g-pawn(with Kg6 to start with)

White to Play

White to Play

1.Ra5 starts the winning process

Position 3

Capablanca-Yates Hastings 1930/31

White to Play(Diagram)

The winning plan is
-transfer the rook to the 8th rank
-f4-f5-f6+

White to Play

White to Play

1.Rd6 is the optimal solution

And now back to the original question

Korchnoi-Antoshin USSR ch 1954

After 1.h5(Diagram)

Black to play and what result?

In the game after mutual errors, White eventually won. The analysis was quite confusing and I had to take quite a long time to get a better understanding.

Black to Play

Black to Play

1..Ra5! draws

The defensive method is
-provoke g3-g4(completely not obvious why)
-prevent e4-e5 with ..f6(key move)
-..Kg8-h7 to prevent Kg6 infiltration(also not obvious)
-side and rear attacks on the pawns.

All examples together

Checking Negi 1.e4 vs Sicilian III

1.e4 vs The Sicilian III-Negi(Quality Chess 2016)

This is another must have book for 1.e4 players and Sicilian defenders.

 

20160915_073215

Time to get to work

20160915_073242

Work harder and work more.

 

  • Ch 1-7 Taimanov(4..Nc6)
  • Ch 8-14 Kan (4..e6)
  • Ch 15-18 Scheveningen Keres Attack
  • Ch 19-22 Sidelines

Here is sample line from Chapter 21 2..e6 Sidelines

After 8.ef(Diagram)

Negi gives 8..ab leading to a clear advantage for White, citing Hansen-Jiang Montreal 2012.

Theory has marched on as 8..Bxf2+ was played in Szabo,G-Mihok,O Hun Ch 2016 which was an improvement.

After 8.ef

After 8.ef

After 14..gf(Diagram) of the Szabo-Mihok game

The game continued with 15.Bxb5+ and was eventually drawn but I propose 15.Qxd5N as an improvement(on the improvement) and White is slightly better

After 14..gf

After 14..gf

It’s a nice book but I don’t play 1.e4 so that is all the work I feel like doing on this line.

 

Checking Avrukh-1.d4 Vol1B

The tedious task of creating and checking files continues with the new Avrukh repertoire book 1.d4 The Queen’s Gambit Volume 1B(Quality Chess 2016)

 

20160915_063134

Better get busy

 

20160915_063205

Avrukh has made to somewhere on my desk to be looked at sooner rather than later.

396 pages.

  • Ch 1-6 QGA 3.e4
  • Ch 7- 18 Slav 4.e3
  • Ch 19-24 Minor Lines

Here is an example chapter

Ch 1 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 dc 4.e4 b5

Position 1

After 16.Bd2(diagram)

Avrukh’s sample line gives 16..Nc3?! leading to a clear advantage for White.

After 16.Bd2

After 16.Bd2

I suggest 16..Rfc8= as an improvement.

Position 2

After 11.Bd4(Diagram)

Avrukh gives 11..f6 but 11..Nf6 bringing out a piece makes more sense to me.

After 11.Bd4

After 11.Bd4

This is a must have book for 1.d4 players or if you just like books and have a lot of spare time.

My Avrukh diet is one chapter per day, more if I can manage it.

 

Baku 2016

Chessbase Report

Nice Report by GM King

GM Almasi,Z(HUN) at the Olympiad: Baku 2016

Almasi Games

Veteran GM Almasi,Z had a great Olympiad, seemingly winning game after game.

Almasi(left)

GM Almasi,Z(left) and two Polgars standing behind.

 

Almasi Zoltan GM 2684 HUN Rp:2845
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 383 IM Nanjo Ryosuke 2340 JPN 2309 6,5 s ½ 2
2 278 IM Kreisl Robert 2448 AUT 2428 5,5 w 1 3
3 25 GM Radjabov Teimour 2722 AZE 2624 5,5 w 1 2
5 88 GM Neiksans Arturs 2628 LAT 2586 5,5 s ½ 3
7 252 IM Georgiadis Nico 2475 SUI 2418 6,0 w 1 3
8 15 GM Li Chao b 2746 CHN 2534 3,5 s 1 3
9 142 GM Gelashvili Tamaz 2575 GEO 2476 4,0 w 1 3
10 107 GM L’Ami Erwin 2611 NED 2606 4,5 s ½ 2
11 117 GM Mastrovasilis Dimitrios 2601 GRE 2527 3,5 w 1 2

Almasi-Gelashivil

After 24..Nb6(Diagram)

The c-pawn looks like its just hanging but Black can reply ..Be4.

So should White take the pawn?

After 24..Nb6

After 24..Nb6

L’Ami-Almasi

After 14.Rd1(Diagram)

White has not castled yet but has taken over the centre with his pawns. Black has a mobile queenside majority and an easy counterplay plan-just push the pawns.

How should Black play?

After 14.Rd1

After 14.Rd1

Almasi-Kreisl

After 76..Kc2(Diagram)

How do you convert the extra pawn?

After 76..Kc2

After 76..Kc2

Photos from Official Site

Iran

Botez,A(CAN)

Botez,A(CAN)

Baku OLM 2016 Details(HUN)

Photos from Official Site

Open

Almasi had a great event while Rapport had a subpar performance.

Lithuania

Lithuania

 

15. Hungary (HUN / RtgAvg:2673, Captain: Polgar Judit / TB1: 15 / TB2: 329)
Bo. Name Rtg FED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Pts. Games Rp w we w-we K rtg+/-
1 GM Rapport Richard 2752 HUN ½ 0 1 0 1 0 ½ 0 3,0 8 2527 3 5,32 -2,32 10 -23,2
2 GM Berkes Ferenc 2640 HUN 1 1 1 0 1 1 ½ 0 ½ ½ 6,5 10 2658 6,5 6,02 0,48 10 4,8
3 GM Almasi Zoltan 2684 HUN ½ 1 1 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 7,5 9 2845 7,5 5,75 1,75 10 17,5
4 GM Balogh Csaba 2614 HUN 1 0 1 1 1 1 ½ 1 ½ 7,0 9 2661 7 6,27 0,73 10 7,3
5 IM Gledura Benjamin 2585 HUN 1 1 0 1 1 ½ ½ 0 5,0 8 2552 5 5,05 -0,05 10 -0,5

Player info

Rapport Richard GM 2752 HUN Rp:2527
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
2 30 GM Ragger Markus 2697 AUT 2697 6,5 w ½ 1
3 9 GM Mamedyarov Shakhriyar 2761 AZE 2756 6,5 s 0 1
4 372 FM Ampie Mauro 2348 NCA 2392 4,5 w 1 1
5 45 GM Shirov Alexei 2673 LAT 2723 6,0 s 0 1
6 272 GM Rodriguez Vila Andres 2453 URU 2375 4,5 s 1 1
7 165 GM Pelletier Yannick 2555 SUI 2613 6,5 w 0 1
8 12 GM Ding Liren 2753 CHN 2775 7,5 s ½ 1
9 53 GM Jobava Baadur 2665 GEO 2926 8,0 w 0 1
Berkes Ferenc GM 2640 HUN Rp:2658
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 338 IM Kojima Shinya 2398 JPN 2396 5,5 w 1 1
2 144 GM Shengelia David 2573 AUT 2424 6,0 s 1 2
4 522 FM Pineda Juan Jose 2175 NCA 2282 3,5 s 1 2
5 62 GM Kovalenko Igor 2651 LAT 2744 8,0 w 0 2
6 384 IM Rodi Luis Ernesto 2340 URU 2158 3,0 w 1 2
7 160 GM Bogner Sebastian 2559 SUI 2576 5,5 s 1 2
8 23 GM Yu Yangyi 2725 CHN 2662 7,0 w ½ 2
9 110 GM Mchedlishvili Mikheil 2609 GEO 2620 4,5 s 0 2
10 10 GM Giri Anish 2755 NED 2750 7,0 w ½ 1
11 85 GM Papaioannou Ioannis 2631 GRE 2668 6,0 s ½ 1
Almasi Zoltan GM 2684 HUN Rp:2845
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 383 IM Nanjo Ryosuke 2340 JPN 2309 6,5 s ½ 2
2 278 IM Kreisl Robert 2448 AUT 2428 5,5 w 1 3
3 25 GM Radjabov Teimour 2722 AZE 2624 5,5 w 1 2
5 88 GM Neiksans Arturs 2628 LAT 2586 5,5 s ½ 3
7 252 IM Georgiadis Nico 2475 SUI 2418 6,0 w 1 3
8 15 GM Li Chao b 2746 CHN 2534 3,5 s 1 3
9 142 GM Gelashvili Tamaz 2575 GEO 2476 4,0 w 1 3
10 107 GM L’Ami Erwin 2611 NED 2606 4,5 s ½ 2
11 117 GM Mastrovasilis Dimitrios 2601 GRE 2527 3,5 w 1 2
Balogh Csaba GM 2614 HUN Rp:2661
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 480 Averbukh Alex 2223 JPN 2108 3,5 w 1 3
3 50 GM Mamedov Rauf 2666 AZE 2783 6,0 s 0 3
4 511 FM Alfaro William 2188 NCA 2186 3,5 w 1 3
5 332 IM Sveshnikov Vladimir 2404 LAT 2487 2,5 w 1 4
6 434 FM Larrea Manuel 2279 URU 2177 3,0 s 1 3
7 284 IM Studer Noel 2445 SUI 2411 4,0 s 1 4
9 226 GM Sanikidze Tornike 2497 GEO 2552 3,5 s ½ 4
10 44 GM Van Wely Loek 2674 NED 2583 4,0 w 1 3
11 146 GM Banikas Hristos 2571 GRE 2595 5,0 s ½ 3
Gledura Benjamin IM 2585 HUN Rp:2552
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 581 CM Yamada Kohei 2100 JPN 2251 6,0 s 1 4
2 312 IM Dragnev Valentin 2430 AUT 2490 5,0 s 1 4
3 32 GM Naiditsch Arkadij 2696 AZE 2571 5,0 w 0 4
4 505 FM Bravo William 2194 NCA 2237 3,5 s 1 4
6 477 IM Coppola Claudio 2230 URU 2310 6,0 w 1 4
8 27 GM Wei Yi 2717 CHN 2601 5,5 w ½ 4
10 75 GM Van Kampen Robin 2640 NED 2620 5,5 s ½ 4
11 154 GM Halkias Stelios 2565 GRE 2739 7,0 w 0 4

Women

Hoang was solid on board one.

16. Hungary (HUN / RtgAvg:2393, Captain: Papp Gabor / TB1: 15 / TB2: 304)
Bo. Name Rtg FED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Pts. Games Rp w we w-we K rtg+/-
1 GM Hoang Thanh Trang 2467 HUN 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 6,0 10 2484 6 5,68 0,32 10 3,2
2 IM Lazarne Vajda Szidonia 2372 HUN 1 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 0 5,0 10 2311 5 5,67 -0,67 10 -6,7
3 WGM Papp Petra 2336 HUN 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 5,0 8 2315 5 5,06 -0,06 20 -1,2
4 WGM Gara Ticia 2379 HUN 1 1 ½ 1 1 0 ½ 0 5,0 8 2249 5 6,03 -1,03 20 -20,6
5 IM Gara Anita 2355 HUN 1 1 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 0 5,0 8 2277 5 5,64 -0,64 10 -6,4

Player info

Hoang Thanh Trang GM 2467 HUN Rp:2484
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
2 186 IM Sanchez Castillo Sarai Carolina 2182 VEN 2044 2,0 w 1 1
3 29 IM Atalik Ekaterina 2422 TUR 2360 6,0 s ½ 1
4 6 GM Kosteniuk Alexandra 2538 RUS 2523 6,0 w ½ 1
5 24 GM Cramling Pia 2444 SWE 2537 8,5 w ½ 1
6 45 WGM Abdumalik Zhansaya 2389 KAZ 2400 6,0 s ½ 1
7 109 WIM Frayna Janelle Mae 2281 PHI 2409 7,0 s 1 1
8 3 GM Muzychuk Anna 2550 UKR 2629 7,5 w ½ 1
9 11 GM Stefanova Antoaneta 2515 BUL 2478 6,0 w ½ 1
10 63 IM Milliet Sophie 2362 FRA 2507 8,0 s ½ 1
11 26 GM Socko Monika 2437 POL 2410 5,5 w ½ 1
Lazarne Vajda Szidonia IM 2372 HUN Rp:2311
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 330 WCM Gjergji Rozana 1947 ALB 1965 5,0 s 1 1
3 58 WGM Yildiz Betul Cemre 2369 TUR 2336 7,0 w 1 2
4 10 GM Gunina Valentina 2520 RUS 2643 8,0 s ½ 2
5 155 WIM Agrest Inna 2222 SWE 2248 6,5 s 0 2
6 116 WIM Dauletova Gulmira 2275 KAZ 2333 6,0 w ½ 2
7 215 WIM Fronda Jan Jodilyn 2128 PHI 2268 6,0 w 0 2
8 5 GM Muzychuk Mariya 2539 UKR 2471 6,5 s 1 2
9 66 WGM Nikolova Adriana 2358 BUL 2247 6,0 s ½ 2
10 98 IM Collas Silvia 2301 FRA 2415 6,5 w ½ 2
11 28 WGM Zawadzka Jolanta 2429 POL 2450 6,0 s 0 2
Papp Petra WGM 2336 HUN Rp:2315
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 336 WCM Shabanaj Eglantina 1932 ALB 2014 5,0 w 1 2
2 177 WIM Montilla Reyes Jorcerys 2194 VEN 2053 4,0 s ½ 2
3 113 WGM Ozturk Kubra 2277 TUR 2211 6,0 s ½ 3
4 15 WGM Goryachkina Aleksandra 2475 RUS 2328 4,5 w ½ 3
5 295 Bengtsson Jessica 2005 SWE 1913 2,5 w 1 3
6 194 WFM Zhylkaidarova Sholpan 2162 KAZ 2263 6,5 s ½ 3
8 14 GM Zhukova Natalia 2475 UKR 2374 5,0 w ½ 3
9 147 WIM Raeva Elitsa 2232 BUL 2182 6,5 w ½ 3
Gara Ticia WGM 2379 HUN Rp:2249
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 370 WFM Shabanaj Alda 1881 ALB 1863 4,0 s 1 3
2 274 WIM Varela La Madrid Tilsia Carolina 2035 VEN 1974 4,0 w 1 3
3 199 WIM Topel Zehra 2156 TUR 2045 1,5 w ½ 4
5 348 Cramling Bellon Anna 1913 SWE 1983 3,0 s 1 4
7 252 Bernales Christy Lamiel 2065 PHI 2087 1,5 s 1 3
8 34 IM Gaponenko Inna 2416 UKR 2483 5,0 s 0 4
10 130 WGM Maisuradze Nino 2256 FRA 2224 4,5 s ½ 3
11 71 WGM Kulon Klaudia 2346 POL 2506 9,0 w 0 3
Gara Anita IM 2355 HUN Rp:2277
Rd. SNo Name Rtg FED Rp Pts. Res. Bo.
1 402 WCM Tuzi Bruna 1807 ALB 1887 4,5 w 1 4
2 258 WIM Ubaldo Suarez Maria Gisela 2062 VEN 2097 6,5 s 1 4
4 13 WGM Pogonina Natalija 2484 RUS 2461 6,0 s 0 4
6 253 Mukhit Aisezym 2065 KAZ 2025 2,5 w ½ 4
7 224 WIM Secopito Catherine 2119 PHI 2275 7,0 w 1 4
9 102 WGM Voiska Margarita 2290 BUL 2235 3,0 s ½ 4
10 143 WIM Navrotescu Andreea-Cristiana 2235 FRA 2285 7,0 w 1 4
11 138 WIM Wozniak Mariola 2246 POL 2891 6,0 s 0 4

Baku OLM 2016 Rd11 Final

Photos from Official Site See also the Chessbase Report.

Ukraine-Bulgaira

Ukraine-Bulgaira

The Hungarian teams became invisible-I can’t find any pictures of them.

Board Pairings – Women

Hungary lost by a wide margin to Poland.

Round 11 on 2016/09/13 at 11:00
Bo. 1
 

  China (CHN)

Rtg 3
 

  Russia (RUS)

Rtg 2½:1½
1.1 GM
Hou, Yifan
2658 GM
Kosteniuk, Alexandra
2538 ½ – ½
1.2 GM
Ju, Wenjun
2583 GM
Gunina, Valentina
2520 1 – 0
1.3 WGM
Tan, Zhongyi
2475 WGM
Goryachkina, Aleksandra
2475 1 – 0
1.4 IM
Guo, Qi
2417 WGM
Pogonina, Natalija
2484 0 – 1
Bo. 8
 

  Hungary (HUN)

Rtg 7
 

  Poland (POL)

Rtg ½ :3½
2.1 GM
Hoang, Thanh Trang
2467 GM
Socko, Monika
2437 ½ – ½
2.2 IM
Lazarne Vajda, Szidonia
2372 WGM
Zawadzka, Jolanta
2429 0 – 1
2.3 WGM
Gara, Ticia
2379 WGM
Kulon, Klaudia
2346 0 – 1
2.4 IM
Gara, Anita
2355 WIM
Wozniak, Mariola
2246 0 – 1
Bo. 2
 

  Ukraine (UKR)

Rtg 9
 

  Bulgaria (BUL)

Rtg 3 : 1
3.1 GM
Muzychuk, Anna
2550 GM
Stefanova, Antoaneta
2515 1 – 0
3.2 GM
Muzychuk, Mariya
2539 IM
Videnova, Iva
2386 ½ – ½
3.3 GM
Zhukova, Natalia
2475 WGM
Nikolova, Adriana
2358 ½ – ½
3.4 GM
Ushenina, Anna
2457 WIM
Raeva, Elitsa
2232 1 – 0

 

Final Standings

The last round loss really hurt the Hungarian team who finished far below their 8th seed to finish at 16th on tiedbreaks.

China took the overall gold.

Rk. SNo Team Team Games   +   =   –  TB1  TB2  TB3  TB4
1 1 China CHN 11 9 2 0 20 416,0 31,0 149,00
2 7 Poland POL 11 8 1 2 17 427,5 33,0 152,00
3 2 Ukraine UKR 11 7 3 1 17 404,5 30,5 156,00
4 3 Russia RUS 11 7 2 2 16 380,5 29,0 157,00
5 5 India IND 11 6 4 1 16 342,5 28,0 146,00
6 6 United States of America USA 11 7 2 2 16 332,5 27,0 149,00
7 19 Vietnam VIE 11 7 2 2 16 328,0 27,5 145,00
8 16 Azerbaijan 1 AZE 11 7 2 2 16 309,0 25,5 151,00
9 18 Israel ISR 11 7 2 2 16 307,5 26,5 137,00
10 4 Georgia GEO 11 7 1 3 15 356,5 30,5 137,00
11 13 Iran IRI 11 7 1 3 15 337,5 31,0 127,00
12 12 Lithuania LTU 11 7 1 3 15 324,0 29,0 131,00
13 27 Serbia SRB 11 7 1 3 15 321,5 28,5 134,00
14 23 France FRA 11 7 1 3 15 320,0 29,0 133,00
15 9 Bulgaria BUL 11 6 3 2 15 309,5 27,0 130,00
16 8   Hungary HUN 11 6 3 2 15 304,0 26,0 142,00

Board Pairings – Open

USA beat Canada by a narrow margin and won gold overall.

Almasi won again but only tied Greece.

GM Bareev(Can)

GM Bareev(Can)

 

Round 11 on 2016/09/13 at 10:00
Bo. 2
 

  United States of America (USA)

Rtg 25
 

  Canada (CAN)

Rtg 2½:1½
1.1 GM
Caruana, Fabiano
2808 GM
Bareev, Evgeny
2675 1 – 0
1.2 GM
Nakamura, Hikaru
2789 GM
Kovalyov, Anton
2617 ½ – ½
1.3 GM
So, Wesley
2782 GM
Lesiege, Alexandre
2512 1 – 0
1.4 GM
Shankland, Samuel L
2679 GM
Hansen, Eric
2582 0 – 1
Bo. 5
 

  Ukraine (UKR)

Rtg 29
 

  Slovenia (SLO)

Rtg 3½: ½
2.1 GM
Eljanov, Pavel
2739 GM
Beliavsky, Alexander G
2602 1 – 0
2.2 GM
Ponomariov, Ruslan
2709 GM
Lenic, Luka
2622 ½ – ½
2.3 GM
Korobov, Anton
2675 GM
Borisek, Jure
2558 1 – 0
2.4 GM
Volokitin, Andrei
2647 GM
Sebenik, Matej
2526 1 – 0
Bo. 1
 

  Russia (RUS)

Rtg 36
 

  Italy (ITA)

Rtg 3 : 1
3.1 GM
Kramnik, Vladimir
2808 GM
Vocaturo, Daniele
2583 1 – 0
3.2 GM
Tomashevsky, Evgeny
2731 GM
Rombaldoni, Axel
2567 ½ – ½
3.3 GM
Nepomniachtchi, Ian
2740 GM
Brunello, Sabino
2568 ½ – ½
3.4 GM
Grischuk, Alexander
2754 FM
Moroni, Luca Jr
2459 1 – 0

 

Bo. 27
 

  Greece (GRE)

Rtg 10
 

  Hungary (HUN)

Rtg 2 : 2
8.1 GM
Papaioannou, Ioannis
2631 GM
Berkes, Ferenc
2640 ½ – ½
8.2 GM
Mastrovasilis, Dimitrios
2601 GM
Almasi, Zoltan
2684 0 – 1
8.3 GM
Banikas, Hristos
2571 GM
Balogh, Csaba
2614 ½ – ½
8.4 GM
Halkias, Stelios
2565 IM
Gledura, Benjamin
2585 1 – 0

Final standings

Canada had an incredible result and finished 11th on tiebreaks.

Hungary was a slightly disappointing 15th on tiebreaks.

Rk. SNo Team Team Games   +   =   –  TB1  TB2  TB3  TB4
1 2 United States of America USA 11 9 2 0 20 413,5 31,5 152,00
2 5 Ukraine UKR 11 10 0 1 20 404,5 31,0 153,00
3 1 Russia RUS 11 8 2 1 18 419,0 32,0 151,00
4 9 India IND 11 7 2 2 16 350,5 27,5 158,00
5 12 Norway NOR 11 7 2 2 16 344,5 26,5 147,00
6 19 Turkey TUR 11 7 2 2 16 341,5 30,0 135,00
7 7 Poland POL 11 7 2 2 16 331,0 29,5 132,00
8 8 France FRA 11 6 4 1 16 326,5 30,0 131,00
9 6 England ENG 11 7 2 2 16 323,0 26,5 144,00
10 34 Peru PER 11 7 2 2 16 306,0 26,5 139,00
11 25   Canada CAN 11 7 1 3 15 368,5 30,5 148,00
12 4 Azerbaijan 1 AZE 11 7 1 3 15 352,0 28,5 149,00
13 3 China CHN 11 7 1 3 15 348,0 29,0 146,00
14 23 Belarus BLR 11 6 3 2 15 332,0 27,5 142,00
15 10   Hungary HUN 11 7 1 3 15 329,0 29,0 136,00
16 46 Iran IRI 11 6 3 2 15 318,0 28,0 138,00
17 21 Latvia LAT 11 7 1 3 15 316,0 26,5 140,00
18 27 Greece GRE 11 4 7 0 15 309,5 25,5 142,00
19 39 Paraguay PAR 11 7 1 3 15 298,5 26,5 135,00
20 29 Slovenia SLO 11 6 3 2 15 294,0 27,0 137,00
21 18 Croatia CRO 11 7 1 3 15 292,0 26,0 132,00
22 36 Italy ITA 11 6 3 2 15 284,5 26,0 135,00
23 33 Brazil BRA 11 7 1 3 15 266,5 26,0 126,00
Barbados-Kenya

Barbados-Kenya