Category Archives: Uncategorized
TWIC 1142 Sept 26-2016
Some games from TWIC.
Anton Guijarro,D-Banusz,T
Queen’s Gambit Accepted(D20) 3.e4 Nc6
3.e4 is Avurkh’s new recommendation for White in 1.d4 Vol1B(Quality Chess 2016) just published.

Black went for sharp counterplay but White was more than ready.
After 15..fe
Vovk-Ponizil
Grunfeld Exchange 8.Be3(D85)
After 16.a4!?(Diagram)
White ground out a win with some help from Black but the start was an interesting minority attack with 16.a4
After 16.a4
After 26..Rb5(Diagram)
Black is down a pawn and even after ..Rb2 keeping the rook active Black just could not generate any counterplay as f2 was secured very conveniently by White’s bishop.
After 26..Rb5
Cheparinov-Harikrishna
Queen’s Indian/Closed Catalan Hybrid(E15)
Black played a patient waiting game and defended against White’s typical queenside majority and was ultimately rewarded.
After 45.Kb4(Diagram)
The Q+B battery has been neutralised but the kingside pawn arrangement and now the Q+N tandem has a chance to be effective as Nc5 has a stable outpost.
After 45.Kb4
More Rook Endings(Please!): The Steckner Position
All rook endings are drawn-someone
Example 9-158 Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual
White to Play(Diagram)
White has an extra pawn but Black’s rook is in an ideal defensive position, behind the passed pawn and targeting the f-pawn.
What does White do now? and what is the objective evaluation?
White to Play
Warning: You either know this or you don’t. This is very hard without prior knowledge.
The Tedious World of Rook Endings
4 Pawns vs 3 Pawns with All the Pawns on the Same Side
Most players know this is a theoretical draw. Let’s have a closer look at the examples in Dvoretsky’s Endgame Manual.

Korchnoi-Antoshin USSR ch 1954(Diagram)
If Black were on the move, the standard drawing plan is ..h5 followed by ..g6 and then trade off pawns whenever possible for the draw.
White to play
so anticipating the coming ..h5, White played 1.h5
White to Play
After 1.h5(diagram)
Black to play
So is this a draw? or can White squeeze out a win?
Black to Play
In order to grasp what is going on, knowledge of three other positions in needed
Position 1
Black to Play(Diagram)
This is a well-known standard draw type of position.
Black to Play
1..h5! is the key move and rear attacks by the black rook is the key defensive method.
Position 2
Botvinnik-Najdorf Moscow ol 1956
White to Play(Diagram)
This is a winning position for White.
The e4-e5 advance cannot be prevented and the weak light squares make it easy for the white king to infiltrate further and attack the backward g-pawn(with Kg6 to start with)
White to Play
1.Ra5 starts the winning process
Position 3
Capablanca-Yates Hastings 1930/31
White to Play(Diagram)
The winning plan is
-transfer the rook to the 8th rank
-f4-f5-f6+
White to Play
1.Rd6 is the optimal solution
And now back to the original question
Korchnoi-Antoshin USSR ch 1954
After 1.h5(Diagram)
Black to play and what result?
In the game after mutual errors, White eventually won. The analysis was quite confusing and I had to take quite a long time to get a better understanding.
Black to Play
1..Ra5! draws
The defensive method is
-provoke g3-g4(completely not obvious why)
-prevent e4-e5 with ..f6(key move)
-..Kg8-h7 to prevent Kg6 infiltration(also not obvious)
-side and rear attacks on the pawns.
Checking Negi 1.e4 vs Sicilian III
1.e4 vs The Sicilian III-Negi(Quality Chess 2016)
This is another must have book for 1.e4 players and Sicilian defenders.

- Ch 1-7 Taimanov(4..Nc6)
- Ch 8-14 Kan (4..e6)
- Ch 15-18 Scheveningen Keres Attack
- Ch 19-22 Sidelines
Here is sample line from Chapter 21 2..e6 Sidelines
After 8.ef(Diagram)
Negi gives 8..ab leading to a clear advantage for White, citing Hansen-Jiang Montreal 2012.
Theory has marched on as 8..Bxf2+ was played in Szabo,G-Mihok,O Hun Ch 2016 which was an improvement.
After 8.ef
After 14..gf(Diagram) of the Szabo-Mihok game
The game continued with 15.Bxb5+ and was eventually drawn but I propose 15.Qxd5N as an improvement(on the improvement) and White is slightly better
After 14..gf
It’s a nice book but I don’t play 1.e4 so that is all the work I feel like doing on this line.
Checking Avrukh-1.d4 Vol1B
The tedious task of creating and checking files continues with the new Avrukh repertoire book 1.d4 The Queen’s Gambit Volume 1B(Quality Chess 2016)

396 pages.
- Ch 1-6 QGA 3.e4
- Ch 7- 18 Slav 4.e3
- Ch 19-24 Minor Lines
Here is an example chapter
Position 1
After 16.Bd2(diagram)
Avrukh’s sample line gives 16..Nc3?! leading to a clear advantage for White.
After 16.Bd2
I suggest 16..Rfc8= as an improvement.
Position 2
After 11.Bd4(Diagram)
Avrukh gives 11..f6 but 11..Nf6 bringing out a piece makes more sense to me.
After 11.Bd4
This is a must have book for 1.d4 players or if you just like books and have a lot of spare time.
My Avrukh diet is one chapter per day, more if I can manage it.
GM Almasi,Z(HUN) at the Olympiad: Baku 2016
Veteran GM Almasi,Z had a great Olympiad, seemingly winning game after game.

GM Almasi,Z(left) and two Polgars standing behind.
| Almasi Zoltan GM 2684 HUN Rp:2845 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 383 | IM | Nanjo Ryosuke | 2340 | JPN | 2309 | 6,5 | s ½ | 2 |
| 2 | 278 | IM | Kreisl Robert | 2448 | AUT | 2428 | 5,5 | w 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 25 | GM | Radjabov Teimour | 2722 | AZE | 2624 | 5,5 | w 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 88 | GM | Neiksans Arturs | 2628 | LAT | 2586 | 5,5 | s ½ | 3 |
| 7 | 252 | IM | Georgiadis Nico | 2475 | SUI | 2418 | 6,0 | w 1 | 3 |
| 8 | 15 | GM | Li Chao b | 2746 | CHN | 2534 | 3,5 | s 1 | 3 |
| 9 | 142 | GM | Gelashvili Tamaz | 2575 | GEO | 2476 | 4,0 | w 1 | 3 |
| 10 | 107 | GM | L’Ami Erwin | 2611 | NED | 2606 | 4,5 | s ½ | 2 |
| 11 | 117 | GM | Mastrovasilis Dimitrios | 2601 | GRE | 2527 | 3,5 | w 1 | 2 |
Almasi-Gelashivil
After 24..Nb6(Diagram)
The c-pawn looks like its just hanging but Black can reply ..Be4.
So should White take the pawn?
After 24..Nb6
L’Ami-Almasi
After 14.Rd1(Diagram)
White has not castled yet but has taken over the centre with his pawns. Black has a mobile queenside majority and an easy counterplay plan-just push the pawns.
How should Black play?
After 14.Rd1
Almasi-Kreisl
After 76..Kc2(Diagram)
How do you convert the extra pawn?
After 76..Kc2
Photos from Official Site

Iran

Botez,A(CAN)
Baku OLM 2016 Details(HUN)
Photos from Official Site
Open
Almasi had a great event while Rapport had a subpar performance.

Lithuania
| 15. Hungary (HUN / RtgAvg:2673, Captain: Polgar Judit / TB1: 15 / TB2: 329) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bo. | Name | Rtg | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Pts. | Games | Rp | w | we | w-we | K | rtg+/- | |
| 1 | GM | Rapport Richard | 2752 | HUN | ½ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 3,0 | 8 | 2527 | 3 | 5,32 | -2,32 | 10 | -23,2 | |||
| 2 | GM | Berkes Ferenc | 2640 | HUN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 6,5 | 10 | 2658 | 6,5 | 6,02 | 0,48 | 10 | 4,8 | |
| 3 | GM | Almasi Zoltan | 2684 | HUN | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 7,5 | 9 | 2845 | 7,5 | 5,75 | 1,75 | 10 | 17,5 | ||
| 4 | GM | Balogh Csaba | 2614 | HUN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 7,0 | 9 | 2661 | 7 | 6,27 | 0,73 | 10 | 7,3 | ||
| 5 | IM | Gledura Benjamin | 2585 | HUN | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 5,0 | 8 | 2552 | 5 | 5,05 | -0,05 | 10 | -0,5 | |||
Player info
| Rapport Richard GM 2752 HUN Rp:2527 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 2 | 30 | GM | Ragger Markus | 2697 | AUT | 2697 | 6,5 | w ½ | 1 |
| 3 | 9 | GM | Mamedyarov Shakhriyar | 2761 | AZE | 2756 | 6,5 | s 0 | 1 |
| 4 | 372 | FM | Ampie Mauro | 2348 | NCA | 2392 | 4,5 | w 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 45 | GM | Shirov Alexei | 2673 | LAT | 2723 | 6,0 | s 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 272 | GM | Rodriguez Vila Andres | 2453 | URU | 2375 | 4,5 | s 1 | 1 |
| 7 | 165 | GM | Pelletier Yannick | 2555 | SUI | 2613 | 6,5 | w 0 | 1 |
| 8 | 12 | GM | Ding Liren | 2753 | CHN | 2775 | 7,5 | s ½ | 1 |
| 9 | 53 | GM | Jobava Baadur | 2665 | GEO | 2926 | 8,0 | w 0 | 1 |
| Berkes Ferenc GM 2640 HUN Rp:2658 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 338 | IM | Kojima Shinya | 2398 | JPN | 2396 | 5,5 | w 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 144 | GM | Shengelia David | 2573 | AUT | 2424 | 6,0 | s 1 | 2 |
| 4 | 522 | FM | Pineda Juan Jose | 2175 | NCA | 2282 | 3,5 | s 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 62 | GM | Kovalenko Igor | 2651 | LAT | 2744 | 8,0 | w 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 384 | IM | Rodi Luis Ernesto | 2340 | URU | 2158 | 3,0 | w 1 | 2 |
| 7 | 160 | GM | Bogner Sebastian | 2559 | SUI | 2576 | 5,5 | s 1 | 2 |
| 8 | 23 | GM | Yu Yangyi | 2725 | CHN | 2662 | 7,0 | w ½ | 2 |
| 9 | 110 | GM | Mchedlishvili Mikheil | 2609 | GEO | 2620 | 4,5 | s 0 | 2 |
| 10 | 10 | GM | Giri Anish | 2755 | NED | 2750 | 7,0 | w ½ | 1 |
| 11 | 85 | GM | Papaioannou Ioannis | 2631 | GRE | 2668 | 6,0 | s ½ | 1 |
| Almasi Zoltan GM 2684 HUN Rp:2845 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 383 | IM | Nanjo Ryosuke | 2340 | JPN | 2309 | 6,5 | s ½ | 2 |
| 2 | 278 | IM | Kreisl Robert | 2448 | AUT | 2428 | 5,5 | w 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 25 | GM | Radjabov Teimour | 2722 | AZE | 2624 | 5,5 | w 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 88 | GM | Neiksans Arturs | 2628 | LAT | 2586 | 5,5 | s ½ | 3 |
| 7 | 252 | IM | Georgiadis Nico | 2475 | SUI | 2418 | 6,0 | w 1 | 3 |
| 8 | 15 | GM | Li Chao b | 2746 | CHN | 2534 | 3,5 | s 1 | 3 |
| 9 | 142 | GM | Gelashvili Tamaz | 2575 | GEO | 2476 | 4,0 | w 1 | 3 |
| 10 | 107 | GM | L’Ami Erwin | 2611 | NED | 2606 | 4,5 | s ½ | 2 |
| 11 | 117 | GM | Mastrovasilis Dimitrios | 2601 | GRE | 2527 | 3,5 | w 1 | 2 |
| Balogh Csaba GM 2614 HUN Rp:2661 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 480 | Averbukh Alex | 2223 | JPN | 2108 | 3,5 | w 1 | 3 | |
| 3 | 50 | GM | Mamedov Rauf | 2666 | AZE | 2783 | 6,0 | s 0 | 3 |
| 4 | 511 | FM | Alfaro William | 2188 | NCA | 2186 | 3,5 | w 1 | 3 |
| 5 | 332 | IM | Sveshnikov Vladimir | 2404 | LAT | 2487 | 2,5 | w 1 | 4 |
| 6 | 434 | FM | Larrea Manuel | 2279 | URU | 2177 | 3,0 | s 1 | 3 |
| 7 | 284 | IM | Studer Noel | 2445 | SUI | 2411 | 4,0 | s 1 | 4 |
| 9 | 226 | GM | Sanikidze Tornike | 2497 | GEO | 2552 | 3,5 | s ½ | 4 |
| 10 | 44 | GM | Van Wely Loek | 2674 | NED | 2583 | 4,0 | w 1 | 3 |
| 11 | 146 | GM | Banikas Hristos | 2571 | GRE | 2595 | 5,0 | s ½ | 3 |
| Gledura Benjamin IM 2585 HUN Rp:2552 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 581 | CM | Yamada Kohei | 2100 | JPN | 2251 | 6,0 | s 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 312 | IM | Dragnev Valentin | 2430 | AUT | 2490 | 5,0 | s 1 | 4 |
| 3 | 32 | GM | Naiditsch Arkadij | 2696 | AZE | 2571 | 5,0 | w 0 | 4 |
| 4 | 505 | FM | Bravo William | 2194 | NCA | 2237 | 3,5 | s 1 | 4 |
| 6 | 477 | IM | Coppola Claudio | 2230 | URU | 2310 | 6,0 | w 1 | 4 |
| 8 | 27 | GM | Wei Yi | 2717 | CHN | 2601 | 5,5 | w ½ | 4 |
| 10 | 75 | GM | Van Kampen Robin | 2640 | NED | 2620 | 5,5 | s ½ | 4 |
| 11 | 154 | GM | Halkias Stelios | 2565 | GRE | 2739 | 7,0 | w 0 | 4 |
Women
Hoang was solid on board one.
| 16. Hungary (HUN / RtgAvg:2393, Captain: Papp Gabor / TB1: 15 / TB2: 304) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bo. | Name | Rtg | FED | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Pts. | Games | Rp | w | we | w-we | K | rtg+/- | |
| 1 | GM | Hoang Thanh Trang | 2467 | HUN | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 6,0 | 10 | 2484 | 6 | 5,68 | 0,32 | 10 | 3,2 | |
| 2 | IM | Lazarne Vajda Szidonia | 2372 | HUN | 1 | 1 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 5,0 | 10 | 2311 | 5 | 5,67 | -0,67 | 10 | -6,7 | |
| 3 | WGM | Papp Petra | 2336 | HUN | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 5,0 | 8 | 2315 | 5 | 5,06 | -0,06 | 20 | -1,2 | |||
| 4 | WGM | Gara Ticia | 2379 | HUN | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 5,0 | 8 | 2249 | 5 | 6,03 | -1,03 | 20 | -20,6 | |||
| 5 | IM | Gara Anita | 2355 | HUN | 1 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 5,0 | 8 | 2277 | 5 | 5,64 | -0,64 | 10 | -6,4 | |||
Player info
| Hoang Thanh Trang GM 2467 HUN Rp:2484 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 2 | 186 | IM | Sanchez Castillo Sarai Carolina | 2182 | VEN | 2044 | 2,0 | w 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 29 | IM | Atalik Ekaterina | 2422 | TUR | 2360 | 6,0 | s ½ | 1 |
| 4 | 6 | GM | Kosteniuk Alexandra | 2538 | RUS | 2523 | 6,0 | w ½ | 1 |
| 5 | 24 | GM | Cramling Pia | 2444 | SWE | 2537 | 8,5 | w ½ | 1 |
| 6 | 45 | WGM | Abdumalik Zhansaya | 2389 | KAZ | 2400 | 6,0 | s ½ | 1 |
| 7 | 109 | WIM | Frayna Janelle Mae | 2281 | PHI | 2409 | 7,0 | s 1 | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | GM | Muzychuk Anna | 2550 | UKR | 2629 | 7,5 | w ½ | 1 |
| 9 | 11 | GM | Stefanova Antoaneta | 2515 | BUL | 2478 | 6,0 | w ½ | 1 |
| 10 | 63 | IM | Milliet Sophie | 2362 | FRA | 2507 | 8,0 | s ½ | 1 |
| 11 | 26 | GM | Socko Monika | 2437 | POL | 2410 | 5,5 | w ½ | 1 |
| Lazarne Vajda Szidonia IM 2372 HUN Rp:2311 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 330 | WCM | Gjergji Rozana | 1947 | ALB | 1965 | 5,0 | s 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 58 | WGM | Yildiz Betul Cemre | 2369 | TUR | 2336 | 7,0 | w 1 | 2 |
| 4 | 10 | GM | Gunina Valentina | 2520 | RUS | 2643 | 8,0 | s ½ | 2 |
| 5 | 155 | WIM | Agrest Inna | 2222 | SWE | 2248 | 6,5 | s 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 116 | WIM | Dauletova Gulmira | 2275 | KAZ | 2333 | 6,0 | w ½ | 2 |
| 7 | 215 | WIM | Fronda Jan Jodilyn | 2128 | PHI | 2268 | 6,0 | w 0 | 2 |
| 8 | 5 | GM | Muzychuk Mariya | 2539 | UKR | 2471 | 6,5 | s 1 | 2 |
| 9 | 66 | WGM | Nikolova Adriana | 2358 | BUL | 2247 | 6,0 | s ½ | 2 |
| 10 | 98 | IM | Collas Silvia | 2301 | FRA | 2415 | 6,5 | w ½ | 2 |
| 11 | 28 | WGM | Zawadzka Jolanta | 2429 | POL | 2450 | 6,0 | s 0 | 2 |
| Papp Petra WGM 2336 HUN Rp:2315 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 336 | WCM | Shabanaj Eglantina | 1932 | ALB | 2014 | 5,0 | w 1 | 2 |
| 2 | 177 | WIM | Montilla Reyes Jorcerys | 2194 | VEN | 2053 | 4,0 | s ½ | 2 |
| 3 | 113 | WGM | Ozturk Kubra | 2277 | TUR | 2211 | 6,0 | s ½ | 3 |
| 4 | 15 | WGM | Goryachkina Aleksandra | 2475 | RUS | 2328 | 4,5 | w ½ | 3 |
| 5 | 295 | Bengtsson Jessica | 2005 | SWE | 1913 | 2,5 | w 1 | 3 | |
| 6 | 194 | WFM | Zhylkaidarova Sholpan | 2162 | KAZ | 2263 | 6,5 | s ½ | 3 |
| 8 | 14 | GM | Zhukova Natalia | 2475 | UKR | 2374 | 5,0 | w ½ | 3 |
| 9 | 147 | WIM | Raeva Elitsa | 2232 | BUL | 2182 | 6,5 | w ½ | 3 |
| Gara Ticia WGM 2379 HUN Rp:2249 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 370 | WFM | Shabanaj Alda | 1881 | ALB | 1863 | 4,0 | s 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 274 | WIM | Varela La Madrid Tilsia Carolina | 2035 | VEN | 1974 | 4,0 | w 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 199 | WIM | Topel Zehra | 2156 | TUR | 2045 | 1,5 | w ½ | 4 |
| 5 | 348 | Cramling Bellon Anna | 1913 | SWE | 1983 | 3,0 | s 1 | 4 | |
| 7 | 252 | Bernales Christy Lamiel | 2065 | PHI | 2087 | 1,5 | s 1 | 3 | |
| 8 | 34 | IM | Gaponenko Inna | 2416 | UKR | 2483 | 5,0 | s 0 | 4 |
| 10 | 130 | WGM | Maisuradze Nino | 2256 | FRA | 2224 | 4,5 | s ½ | 3 |
| 11 | 71 | WGM | Kulon Klaudia | 2346 | POL | 2506 | 9,0 | w 0 | 3 |
| Gara Anita IM 2355 HUN Rp:2277 | |||||||||
| Rd. | SNo | Name | Rtg | FED | Rp | Pts. | Res. | Bo. | |
| 1 | 402 | WCM | Tuzi Bruna | 1807 | ALB | 1887 | 4,5 | w 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 258 | WIM | Ubaldo Suarez Maria Gisela | 2062 | VEN | 2097 | 6,5 | s 1 | 4 |
| 4 | 13 | WGM | Pogonina Natalija | 2484 | RUS | 2461 | 6,0 | s 0 | 4 |
| 6 | 253 | Mukhit Aisezym | 2065 | KAZ | 2025 | 2,5 | w ½ | 4 | |
| 7 | 224 | WIM | Secopito Catherine | 2119 | PHI | 2275 | 7,0 | w 1 | 4 |
| 9 | 102 | WGM | Voiska Margarita | 2290 | BUL | 2235 | 3,0 | s ½ | 4 |
| 10 | 143 | WIM | Navrotescu Andreea-Cristiana | 2235 | FRA | 2285 | 7,0 | w 1 | 4 |
| 11 | 138 | WIM | Wozniak Mariola | 2246 | POL | 2891 | 6,0 | s 0 | 4 |
Baku OLM 2016 Rd11 Final
Photos from Official Site See also the Chessbase Report.

Ukraine-Bulgaira
The Hungarian teams became invisible-I can’t find any pictures of them.
Board Pairings – Women
Hungary lost by a wide margin to Poland.
| Round 11 on 2016/09/13 at 11:00 | ||||||||||||
| Bo. | 1 |
China (CHN) |
Rtg | – | 3 |
Russia (RUS) |
Rtg | 2½:1½ | ||||
| 1.1 | GM |
|
2658 | – | GM |
|
2538 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 1.2 | GM |
|
2583 | – | GM |
|
2520 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 1.3 | WGM |
|
2475 | – | WGM |
|
2475 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 1.4 | IM |
|
2417 | – | WGM |
|
2484 | 0 – 1 | ||||
| Bo. | 8 |
Hungary (HUN) |
Rtg | – | 7 |
Poland (POL) |
Rtg | ½ :3½ | ||||
| 2.1 | GM |
|
2467 | – | GM |
|
2437 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 2.2 | IM |
|
2372 | – | WGM |
|
2429 | 0 – 1 | ||||
| 2.3 | WGM |
|
2379 | – | WGM |
|
2346 | 0 – 1 | ||||
| 2.4 | IM |
|
2355 | – | WIM |
|
2246 | 0 – 1 | ||||
| Bo. | 2 |
Ukraine (UKR) |
Rtg | – | 9 |
Bulgaria (BUL) |
Rtg | 3 : 1 | ||||
| 3.1 | GM |
|
2550 | – | GM |
|
2515 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 3.2 | GM |
|
2539 | – | IM |
|
2386 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 3.3 | GM |
|
2475 | – | WGM |
|
2358 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 3.4 | GM |
|
2457 | – | WIM |
|
2232 | 1 – 0 | ||||
Final Standings
The last round loss really hurt the Hungarian team who finished far below their 8th seed to finish at 16th on tiedbreaks.
China took the overall gold.
| Rk. | SNo | Team | Team | Games | + | = | – | TB1 | TB2 | TB3 | TB4 | |
| 1 | 1 | China | CHN | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 416,0 | 31,0 | 149,00 | |
| 2 | 7 | Poland | POL | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 427,5 | 33,0 | 152,00 | |
| 3 | 2 | Ukraine | UKR | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 17 | 404,5 | 30,5 | 156,00 | |
| 4 | 3 | Russia | RUS | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 380,5 | 29,0 | 157,00 | |
| 5 | 5 | India | IND | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 342,5 | 28,0 | 146,00 | |
| 6 | 6 | United States of America | USA | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 332,5 | 27,0 | 149,00 | |
| 7 | 19 | Vietnam | VIE | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 328,0 | 27,5 | 145,00 | |
| 8 | 16 | Azerbaijan 1 | AZE | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 309,0 | 25,5 | 151,00 | |
| 9 | 18 | Israel | ISR | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 307,5 | 26,5 | 137,00 | |
| 10 | 4 | Georgia | GEO | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 356,5 | 30,5 | 137,00 | |
| 11 | 13 | Iran | IRI | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 337,5 | 31,0 | 127,00 | |
| 12 | 12 | Lithuania | LTU | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 324,0 | 29,0 | 131,00 | |
| 13 | 27 | Serbia | SRB | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 321,5 | 28,5 | 134,00 | |
| 14 | 23 | France | FRA | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 320,0 | 29,0 | 133,00 | |
| 15 | 9 | Bulgaria | BUL | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 309,5 | 27,0 | 130,00 | |
| 16 | 8 | Hungary | HUN | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 304,0 | 26,0 | 142,00 |
Board Pairings – Open
USA beat Canada by a narrow margin and won gold overall.
Almasi won again but only tied Greece.

GM Bareev(Can)
| Round 11 on 2016/09/13 at 10:00 | ||||||||||||
| Bo. | 2 |
United States of America (USA) |
Rtg | – | 25 |
Canada (CAN) |
Rtg | 2½:1½ | ||||
| 1.1 | GM |
|
2808 | – | GM |
|
2675 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 1.2 | GM |
|
2789 | – | GM |
|
2617 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 1.3 | GM |
|
2782 | – | GM |
|
2512 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 1.4 | GM |
|
2679 | – | GM |
|
2582 | 0 – 1 | ||||
| Bo. | 5 |
Ukraine (UKR) |
Rtg | – | 29 |
Slovenia (SLO) |
Rtg | 3½: ½ | ||||
| 2.1 | GM |
|
2739 | – | GM |
|
2602 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 2.2 | GM |
|
2709 | – | GM |
|
2622 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 2.3 | GM |
|
2675 | – | GM |
|
2558 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 2.4 | GM |
|
2647 | – | GM |
|
2526 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| Bo. | 1 |
Russia (RUS) |
Rtg | – | 36 |
Italy (ITA) |
Rtg | 3 : 1 | ||||
| 3.1 | GM |
|
2808 | – | GM |
|
2583 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| 3.2 | GM |
|
2731 | – | GM |
|
2567 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 3.3 | GM |
|
2740 | – | GM |
|
2568 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 3.4 | GM |
|
2754 | – | FM |
|
2459 | 1 – 0 | ||||
| Bo. | 27 |
Greece (GRE) |
Rtg | – | 10 |
Hungary (HUN) |
Rtg | 2 : 2 | ||||
| 8.1 | GM |
|
2631 | – | GM |
|
2640 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 8.2 | GM |
|
2601 | – | GM |
|
2684 | 0 – 1 | ||||
| 8.3 | GM |
|
2571 | – | GM |
|
2614 | ½ – ½ | ||||
| 8.4 | GM |
|
2565 | – | IM |
|
2585 | 1 – 0 |
Final standings
Canada had an incredible result and finished 11th on tiebreaks.
Hungary was a slightly disappointing 15th on tiebreaks.
| Rk. | SNo | Team | Team | Games | + | = | – | TB1 | TB2 | TB3 | TB4 | |
| 1 | 2 | United States of America | USA | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 413,5 | 31,5 | 152,00 | |
| 2 | 5 | Ukraine | UKR | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 404,5 | 31,0 | 153,00 | |
| 3 | 1 | Russia | RUS | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 419,0 | 32,0 | 151,00 | |
| 4 | 9 | India | IND | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 350,5 | 27,5 | 158,00 | |
| 5 | 12 | Norway | NOR | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 344,5 | 26,5 | 147,00 | |
| 6 | 19 | Turkey | TUR | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 341,5 | 30,0 | 135,00 | |
| 7 | 7 | Poland | POL | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 331,0 | 29,5 | 132,00 | |
| 8 | 8 | France | FRA | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 326,5 | 30,0 | 131,00 | |
| 9 | 6 | England | ENG | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 323,0 | 26,5 | 144,00 | |
| 10 | 34 | Peru | PER | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 306,0 | 26,5 | 139,00 | |
| 11 | 25 | Canada | CAN | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 368,5 | 30,5 | 148,00 | |
| 12 | 4 | Azerbaijan 1 | AZE | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 352,0 | 28,5 | 149,00 | |
| 13 | 3 | China | CHN | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 348,0 | 29,0 | 146,00 | |
| 14 | 23 | Belarus | BLR | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 332,0 | 27,5 | 142,00 | |
| 15 | 10 | Hungary | HUN | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 329,0 | 29,0 | 136,00 | |
| 16 | 46 | Iran | IRI | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 318,0 | 28,0 | 138,00 | |
| 17 | 21 | Latvia | LAT | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 316,0 | 26,5 | 140,00 | |
| 18 | 27 | Greece | GRE | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 15 | 309,5 | 25,5 | 142,00 | |
| 19 | 39 | Paraguay | PAR | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 298,5 | 26,5 | 135,00 | |
| 20 | 29 | Slovenia | SLO | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 294,0 | 27,0 | 137,00 | |
| 21 | 18 | Croatia | CRO | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 292,0 | 26,0 | 132,00 | |
| 22 | 36 | Italy | ITA | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 284,5 | 26,0 | 135,00 | |
| 23 | 33 | Brazil | BRA | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 266,5 | 26,0 | 126,00 | |

Barbados-Kenya














